首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Access to land reconsidered: The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania's new wave land reform
【24h】

Access to land reconsidered: The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania's new wave land reform

机译:重新考虑获得土地的机会:土地抢夺,多中心治理和坦桑尼亚的新一轮土地改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inspired by Ostrom's concept of polycentric governance, this article aims to refine the analytical framework through which contemporary access to land is analysed. By drawing on extensive fieldwork and conducting a review of the existing literature on the making and implementation of Tanzania's 1999 land reform, it challenges some of the main assumptions behind the land access and land grabbing literatures about the level at which agency is placed. Processes governing access to land are more contingent than they are most often depicted, involving actors at the local, national and international levels. National and local level actors are often more important than, in particular, the land grab literature tends to suggest. This implies that the state should be seen not merely as a site of 'legitimate theft', but also as one in which rights may be upheld. Based on the experience of Tanzania, the article suggests that analytical a priori assumptions about where agency is placed should be abandoned and replaced with empirical research into the relations between actors at all levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:受奥斯特罗姆(Ostrom)多中心治理概念的启发,本文旨在完善分析框架,通过该框架来分析当代对土地的获取。通过广泛的田野调查并回顾有关坦桑尼亚1999年土地改革的制定和实施的现有文献,它挑战了有关土地使用权和土地获取文献背后关于代理机构水平的一些主要假设。控制获取土地的过程比通常所描述的更为偶然,涉及地方,国家和国际各级的参与者。国家和地方层面的行动者通常比土地抢劫文献所暗示的更为重要。这意味着,国家不仅应被视为“合法盗窃”的场所,而且应被视为维护权利的场所。根据坦桑尼亚的经验,该文章建议应放弃关于代理机构放置位置的先验分析假设,而应以对各级参与者之间关系的实证研究代替。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号