...
首页> 外文期刊>Geo-Marine Letters >Reply to Discussion: a critique of Possible waterways between the Marmara Sea and the Black Sea in the late Quaternary: evidence from ostracod and foraminifer assemblages in lakes İznik and Sapanca, Turkey, Geo-Marine Letters, 2011
【24h】

Reply to Discussion: a critique of Possible waterways between the Marmara Sea and the Black Sea in the late Quaternary: evidence from ostracod and foraminifer assemblages in lakes İznik and Sapanca, Turkey, Geo-Marine Letters, 2011

机译:对讨论的答复:对第四纪后期马尔马拉海和黑海之间可能的航道的批评:土耳其伊兹尼克湖和萨潘卡湖中的成龙和有孔虫组合的证据,《海洋地质快报》,2011年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In their discussion of our 2011 paper dealing with possible waterways between the Marmara Sea and the Black Sea in the “late” Quaternary, based on data from ostracod and foraminifer assemblages in lakes İznik and Sapanca, Turkey, Yaltırak et al. (Geo-Mar Lett 32:267–274, 2012) essentially reject the idea of any links whatsoever, be they between the Marmara Sea and the lakes İznik and Sapanca, or further to the Black Sea via the valley of the Sakarya River. The evidence they provide in support of their view, however, is essentially circumstantial, in part conjectural, and also inconclusive considering the findings in favour of linkage between the Marmara Sea and the lakes at the very least, while the proposed connection with the Sakarya River valley remains speculative because of the lack of unambiguous data. On the other hand, Yaltırak et al. (Geo-Mar Lett 32:267–274, 2012) do raise valid points of concern which deserve careful future investigation, the most important being the possibility of sample contamination from dumped marine sediment used for construction purposes along some parts of the shore of Lake İznik. We agree that a concerted multidisciplinary effort is required to address the many unresolved issues in connection with the potential waterways proposed by us and others before us.
机译:在Yaltırak等人在讨论我们2011年关于“晚期”第四纪马尔马拉海和黑海之间可能的航道的论文时,他们基于土耳其伊兹尼克湖和萨潘卡湖中的成龙和有孔虫组合的数据,Yaltırak等人。 (Geo-Mar Lett 32:267–274,2012)本质上拒绝任何联系的想法,无论它们在马尔马拉海与伊兹尼克湖和萨潘卡湖之间,还是通过萨卡里亚河谷至黑海。然而,他们提供的支持其观点的证据基本上只是旁观的,部分是推测性的,并且考虑到至少有利于马尔马拉海与湖泊之间联系的研究结果,而与萨卡里亚河的拟议联系,这一结论并不确定由于缺乏明确的数据,Valley仍然是投机性的。另一方面,Yaltırak等。 (Geo-Mar Lett 32:267–274,2012)确实引起了值得关注的关注点,值得将来进行仔细研究,最重要的是可能会丢弃湖岸沿岸部分用于建筑目的的倾倒海洋沉积物中的样品污染伊兹尼克。我们同意,需要采取多学科的共同努力,以解决与我们和我们面前的其他人提出的潜在航道有关的许多未解决的问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geo-Marine Letters》 |2012年第3期|p.275-277|共3页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Geological Engineering, Çukurova University, Balcalı, 01330, Adana, Turkey;

    Moda Hüseyin Bey Street No. 15-4, Kadıköy, 34710, İstanbul, Turkey;

    Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Geological Engineering, Çukurova University, Balcalı, 01330, Adana, Turkey;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号