首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Tracking the forces behind volume patterns
【24h】

Tracking the forces behind volume patterns

机译:追踪体积模式背后的力量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

U.S. soybean traders are used to seeing the most activity in nearby contracts, but the trading patterns in Japan and China are quite different. Here's a lesson on how regulations and participants affect liquidity. Soybeans are an important agricultural market around the world, but liquidity patterns in soybean futures markets are much different in the three largest soybean markets in the world. The most active trading periods occur at different stages of the contracts' life cycles: 1. Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), United States―Nearby month contracts. 2. Tokyo Grain Exchange (TGE), Japan―Distant contracts. 3. Dalian Commodity Exchange (DCE), China―Middle month contracts. If we are able to identify different liquidity patterns in different futures markets and understand the reasons for the differences, officials will be in a much better position in their efforts to improve the regulatory systems of soybean futures markets, increase market liquidity and take full advantage of the market economy.
机译:美国大豆交易商习惯于在附近的合约中看到最多的交易,但是日本和中国的交易模式却大不相同。这是有关法规和参与者如何影响流动性的课程。大豆是全球重要的农业市场,但大豆期货市场的流动性模式与世界三大大豆市场大不相同。最活跃的交易期发生在合同生命周期的不同阶段:1.美国芝加哥交易委员会(CBOT)-近月合同。 2.日本东京粮食交易所(TGE)-远期合同。 3.中国大连商品交易所(DCE)-月中合约。如果我们能够确定不同期货市场中不同的流动性模式并理解差异的原因,官员将在改善大豆期货市场的监管体系,增加市场流动性和充分利用大豆期货市场的努力中处于更好的位置。市场经济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号