...
首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Question: Is selling a naked put more risky than executing a covered call? Answer: No. Despite what you may have heard, these positions are identical
【24h】

Question: Is selling a naked put more risky than executing a covered call? Answer: No. Despite what you may have heard, these positions are identical

机译:问题:出售裸露的看跌期权是否比执行有保证的认购权更具风险?答:否。尽管您可能听过,但这些职位是相同的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many of our students, after following our step-by-step criteria before considering such a position, want to sell naked puts on stocks experiencing extremely high volatility. We are staunch proponents of risk averse trading, but there are times when selling naked puts make sense.rnHowever, often brokers try to steer them away from the sale of a naked put because of risk considerations, and instead, try to get them to buy a covered call in its place. Huh? This is akin to saying, "Don't buy six call contracts, buy a half dozen instead." A covered call and the sale of a naked short put are one and the same.
机译:我们的许多学生在按照分步标准进行考虑之后,才考虑出售此类股票,然后希望出售波动性极高的裸眼看跌期权。我们是风险规避交易的坚定支持者,但有时候卖空头看跌期权是有道理的。然而,出于风险考虑,经纪人经常试图将其从卖空头看跌期权中带走,而是试图让他们买入覆盖电话。 ??这就像在说:“不要买六张看涨合约,而是买六张。”一个有盖的看涨期权和一个空头卖空交易是一样的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Futures》 |2010年第5期|p.18|共1页
  • 作者

    ALEX MENDOZA;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号