...
首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Decolonising Technological Futures: A dialogical tryptich between Te Haumoana White, Ruth Irwin, and Tegmark's Artificial Intelligence
【24h】

Decolonising Technological Futures: A dialogical tryptich between Te Haumoana White, Ruth Irwin, and Tegmark's Artificial Intelligence

机译:减少技术的未来:Te Haumoana White,Ruth Irwin和Tegmark的人工智能之间的对话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Colonialism has wrought great injustices across many indigenous people at the during the modern period. Maori exercise unique negotiating skills to productively engage with the power dynamics of colonialism and modernity. This dialogue between Te Haumoana White and Ruth Irwin illuminates the ongoing pressures of modernity and colonialism, unique Maori approaches to ownership, and a deep understanding of power and politics. This dialogue traces historic injustice and contemporary innovations that seek to resuscitate the landscape and the community in, through, and around modern legal and technological onto-epistemologies. At the cutting edge of contemporary technology, AI is using algorithms to aggregate and sift political communities online. Te Haumoana White's insights on land, environment, people and law are reflected on the AI tendency to advocate for the manipulation of popular opinion in the aggregation of AI algorithms. The computer science community who advocate AI seem to have little understanding of political theory, political economics outside the tired and outdated neoliberal paradigm, nor how voice constitutes politics. Thus, Tegmark and others in the AI genre, tend to advocate a 'benign dictatorship' model, based on a combination of neoliberalism and algorithms that are vulnerable to exacerbation and manipulation of popularist trends.
机译:在现代,殖民主义在许多土著人民中造成了巨大的不公。毛利人运用独特的谈判技巧,有效地参与了殖民主义和现代主义的动力变化。 Te Haumoana White与露丝·欧文(Ruth Irwin)之间的对话阐明了现代性和殖民主义的压力,毛利人对所有权的独特态度以及对权力和政治的深刻理解。这场对话追溯了历史的不公正现象和当代的创新,这些创新试图在现代法律和技术本体流行病学之中,之内和周围使景观和社区复苏。在当代技术的最前沿,人工智能正在使用算法来在线汇总和筛选政治团体。 Te Haumoana White对土地,环境,人和法律的见解反映在AI趋势上,该趋势主张在AI算法的聚合中操纵民意。倡导AI的计算机科学界似乎对政治理论,疲惫和过时的新自由主义范式之外的政治经济学缺乏了解,也没有声音如何构成政治。因此,Tegmark和其他AI领域的人倾向于基于新自由主义和算法的组合提倡“良性独裁”模型,这些模型很容易加剧和操纵大众主义趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号