...
首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of hydrogen and power production using different gasification systems
【24h】

Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of hydrogen and power production using different gasification systems

机译:使用不同气化系统的氢气和电力生产的能效经济分析和性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, we investigate three different gasifiers for hydrogen production, namely, downdraft gasifier (DG), circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG) and plasma gasifier (PG) as taken from the literature under Cases 1-3, respectively. These cases are then modified for cogeneration of hydrogen and power. We use the specific exergy cost (SPECO) method to calculate exergy-related parameters and display cost flows for all streams and components. The case studies are selected from different countries. We study how flow rates of streams cost and hydrogen unit costs change if these facilities operate in Turkey. The process life time is considered 15 years, and the inflation rate and energy inflation rate are taken from the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey as 8.91% and 19.25% while unit energy, water and biomass costs are taken 31.38 $/GJ, 4.59 $/t and 35.42 $/t for Turkey, respectively. The electric power requirements are calculated to be 0.0915, 12.53 and 23.26 MW_e for DG, CFBG and PG, respectively. In Cases 1-3, the electric power generated by the systems are 0.144 MW, 1.17 MW and 3.88 MW, respectively and may be sold to the national grid with cost rates of 31.8 $/h, 258.39 $/h and 856.88 $/h. In the systems, the hydrogen production rates and costs per unit mass are obtained to be 0.004 kg/s, 0.521 kg/s and 0.155 kg/s and 1.16 $/kg, 3.33 $/kg and 2.45 $/kg for the DG, the CFBG and the PG, respectively.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了三种不同的制氢气化炉,分别是案例1-3中从文献中选取的下流气化炉(DG),循环流化床气化炉(CFBG)和等离子气化炉(PG)。然后对这些情况进行修改,以产生氢气和电能。我们使用比能值成本(SPECO)方法来计算与能值相关的参数,并显示所有流和组件的成本流。案例研究选自不同的国家。如果这些设施在土耳其运营,我们将研究物流成本和氢气单位成本的流量变化。该过程的使用寿命为15年,通货膨胀率和能源通货膨胀率取自土耳其共和国中央银行,分别为8.91%和19.25%,而单位能源,水和生物质成本则为31.38 $ / GJ,4.59 $ / t和土耳其的$ 35.42 $ / t。 DG,CFBG和PG的电力需求分别计算为0.0915、12.53和23.26 MW_e。在情况1-3中,系统产生的电力分别为0.144 MW,1.17 MW和3.88 MW,可以以31.8美元/小时,258.39美元/小时和856.88美元/小时的成本价出售给国家电网。 。在这些系统中,DG的氢气生产率和每单位质量的成本分别为0.004 kg / s,0.521 kg / s和0.155 kg / s和1.16 $ / kg,3.33 $ / kg和2.45 $ / kg, CFBG和PG。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fuel》 |2012年第2012期|p.187-198|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Technical Programs, Izmir Vocational High School, Dokuz Eylul University, Education Campus Buca, Izmir, Turkey;

    Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yasar University, 35100 Bomova, Izmir, Turkey;

    Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ont., Canada L1H 7K4;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    hydrogen production; downdraft gasification; circulating fluidized bed gasification; plasma gasification; energy;

    机译:制氢气流下气化;循环流化床气化;等离子气化能源;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号