首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >Part-load performance of direct-firing and co-firing of coal and biomass in a power generation system integrated with a CO2 capture and compression system
【24h】

Part-load performance of direct-firing and co-firing of coal and biomass in a power generation system integrated with a CO2 capture and compression system

机译:集成了CO2捕集和压缩系统的发电系统中的煤和生物质直接燃烧和共燃的部分负荷性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is recognised as a key technology to mitigate CO2 emissions and achieve stringent climate targets due to its potential for negative emissions. However, the cost for its deployment is expected to be higher than for fossil-based power plants with CCS. To help in the transition to fully replace fossil fuels, co-firing of coal and biomass provide a less expensive means. Therefore, this work examines the co-firing at various levels in a pulverised supercritical power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture, using a fully integrated model developed in Aspen Plus. Co-firing offers flexibility in terms of the biomass resources needed. This work also investigates flexibility within operation. As a result, the performance of the power plant at various part-loads (40%, 60% and 80%) is studied and compared to the baseline at 100%, using a constant fuel flowrate. It was found that the net power output and net efficiency decrease when the biomass fraction increases for constant heat input and constant fuel flow rate cases. At constant heat input, more fuel is required as the biomass fraction is increased; whilst at constant fuel input, derating occurs, e.g. 30% derating of the power output capacity at firing 100% biomass compared to 100% coal. Co-firing of coal and biomass resulted in substantial power derating at each part-load operation.
机译:带有碳捕集与封存的生物能源(BECCS)由于具有潜在的负排放潜力,因此被认为是减轻CO2排放并实现严格的气候目标的关键技术。但是,其部署成本预计将高于采用CCS的化石发电厂。为了帮助过渡到完全替代化石燃料,将煤和生物质共烧提供了一种较便宜的方法。因此,这项工作使用在Aspen Plus中开发的完全集成模型,研究了粉状超临界发电厂的不同水平同时燃烧后捕集CO2的同时燃烧。共燃为所需生物质资源提供了灵活性。这项工作还调查了操作的灵活性。结果,研究了电厂在各种部分负荷(40%,60%和80%)下的性能,并使用恒定的燃料流量将其与100%的基线进行了比较。发现在恒定热量输入和恒定燃料流量的情况下,当生物质分数增加时,净功率输出和净效率降低。在恒定热量输入下,随着生物质分数的增加,需要更多的燃料。在恒定的燃料输入下会发生降额,例如与100%的煤炭相比,燃烧100%的生物质时功率输出容量降低了30%。煤和生物质的共烧导致每个部分负荷运行时功率的大幅降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fuel》 |2017年第15期|873-884|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Energy Engn Grp, Energy 2050, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England|Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Lahore 54890, Pakistan;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Energy Engn Grp, Energy 2050, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Chester, Dept Chem Engn, Thornton Sci Pk, Chester CH2 4NU, Cheshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Energy Engn Grp, Energy 2050, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Energy Engn Grp, Energy 2050, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Co-firing; Post-combustion; Part-load; CO2 compression; BECCS;

    机译:共燃;后燃烧;部分负荷;CO2压缩;BECCS;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号