...
首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >Preparation of clean coal samples using the Roben Jig
【24h】

Preparation of clean coal samples using the Roben Jig

机译:使用雄靴夹具制备清洁煤样品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study compared three methods of removing mineral matter (washing) from coal: jigging coal particles in water using the Roben Jig, the float/sink method using traditional organic liquids (naptha, perchloroethylene, methylene bromide), and a full-sized industrial wash plant. Clean coal composites from six coal types (A, B, C, D, E, and F) were tested. All coals were washed using the Roben Jig and the float/sink method and seams E and F were also washed in an industrial wash plant. In each case, the Roben Jig was capable of producing a clean coal composites with coal quality characteristics (proximate analysis, FSI, S, calorific value, mineral analysis of ash, RoMax) very similar to that of the clean coal samples created by the organic liquids float/sink method and the industrial wash plant sample. The Gieseler fluidity and Ruhr dilatation values were lower in the traditional float/ sink method where the coal was exposed to organic liquids. There was very little difference in the Sapozhnikov Y values and small differences in the G Caking Index values. All six coal types were carbonized in a sole-heated oven and CSR was tested. Comparing the CSRs for the clean samples created by the Roben Jig and organic liquids for coals A, B, C, and D, in four out of five cases the CSR from the organic liquids treated samples was higher (differences ranging from 2 to 8 points). Coals E and F were washed using all three methods and the samples prepared in the organic liquids had the highest CSRs (differences ranging from 3 to 7). The clean coal samples from Coal F were carbonized in a moveable wall oven. CSRs ranged from 66.7 to 69.2, with the plant sample having the highest value. ASTM stability values ranged from 51.7 to 57.3 with the lowest value resulting from the organic liquids washed sample.
机译:本研究比较了从煤中除去矿物质(洗涤)的三种方法:使用传统有机液体(Naptha,Hol氯乙烯,亚甲基溴)和全尺寸工业洗涤的浮动/水槽方法在水中取出煤矿物质(洗涤)中的夹具煤颗粒植物。从六种煤炭类型(A,B,C,D,E和F)的清洁煤复合材料进行了测试。使用雄靴夹具和浮子/水槽方法和接缝E和F洗涤所有煤也在工业洗涤厂洗涤。在每种情况下,雄靴夹具能够生产具有煤炭质量特性的清洁煤复合材料(近分析,FSI,S,热值,灰烬,romax的矿物分析)非常类似于有机创造的清洁煤样品液体浮子/水槽方法和工业洗涤厂样品。在传统的浮法/水槽方法中较低的枢轴流动性和Ruhr扩张值较低,其中煤暴露于有机液体。 Sapozhnikov Y值差异很小,G结块指数值的小差异。所有六种煤炭类型在唯一加热的烘箱中碳化,并测试了CSR。将CSR与植物夹具和有机液体产生的清洁样品进行比较,用于煤A,B,C和D的有机液体中的四种情况下,从有机液体处理的样品中的CSR较高(差异为2〜8点)。使用所有三种方法洗涤煤e和F,并且在有机液体中制备的样品具有最高的CSR(差异为3至7)。来自煤F的清洁煤样品在可移动的壁炉中碳化。 CSRS从66.7到69.2的范围,植物样本具有最高值。 ASTM稳定值范围为51.7至57.3,用有机液体洗涤样品产生的最低值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fuel》 |2021年第15期|121729.1-121729.7|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Trillium Geosci Ltd Richmond BC Canada;

    Nat Resources Canada CanmetENERGY Met Fuels Lab Ottawa ON Canada;

    Univ British Columbia Norman B Keevil Inst Min Engn Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 Canada;

    Leeder Consulting Inc Surrey BC Canada;

    Teck Resources Ltd 500 Ctr St Suite 1400 Calgary AB T2G 1A6 Canada;

    GWIL Birtley Coal & Minerals Testing 7784 62 St SE Calgary AB T2C 5K2 Canada;

    GWIL Birtley Coal & Minerals Testing 7784 62 St SE Calgary AB T2C 5K2 Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coal; Perchloroethylene; Jigging; Coal washability; Coal rheology; Carbonization;

    机译:煤;高氯乙烯;跳汰;煤炭剥离;煤流变;碳化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号