...
首页> 外文期刊>Fresenius Environmental Bulletin >INTEGRATED AEROSOL OPTICAL THICKNESS, GASEOUS POLLUTANTS AND METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS TO ESTIMATE GROUND PM_(2.5) CONCENTRATION
【24h】

INTEGRATED AEROSOL OPTICAL THICKNESS, GASEOUS POLLUTANTS AND METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS TO ESTIMATE GROUND PM_(2.5) CONCENTRATION

机译:综合气溶胶光学厚度,气态污染物和气象参数估算地面PM_(2.5)浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is difficult to estimate the surface-level particulate matter 2.5 (PM_(2.5)) using satellite-based aerosol optical thickness (AOT) because the relevant correlation is influenced by many factors, such as retrieval AOT algorithms, meteorological parameters and heterogeneous reactions. In this study, we analyzed the influences of four meteorological parameters (temperature, air pressure, relative humidity and wind speed) and four gaseous pollutants (SO_2, NO_2, O_3 and CO) on ground PM_(2.5) estimation. We obtained AOT by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrora-diometer (MODIS) and Landsat 8 in city of Beijing, China from April to November in 2013. By correlation analysis, PM_(2.5) significantly correlated with AOT (R = 0.8), SO_2 (R = 0.83) and relative humidity (R= 0.81), correlated somewhat with NO_2 and O_3, while only weakly correlated with the air pressure. The accuracy is too low to build a linear model to predict ground PM_(2.5) with AOT alone. A more accurate linear model was obtained when incorporating gaseous pollutants and meteorological data (R~2 increased from 0.64 to 0.93, RMSE decreased from 31.2 to 14.1). If meteorological data were not available, using AOT and SO_2 to estimate ground PM_(2.5) could also achieve good results (R~2 = 0.82, RMSE = 22.6). Comparing with linear models, using back propagation (BP) neutral network model to estimate ground PM_(2.5) was found to be more suitable as its RMSE was 6.6, being much smaller than that of the linear models.
机译:使用基于卫星的气溶胶光学厚度(AOT)很难估计表面水平的颗粒物2.5(PM_(2.5)),因为相关的相关性受许多因素的影响,例如检索AOT算法,气象参数和异质反应。在这项研究中,我们分析了四个气象参数(温度,气压,相对湿度和风速)和四种气态污染物(SO_2,NO_2,O_3和CO)对地面PM_(2.5)估算的影响。我们通过中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)和Landsat 8在2013年4月至11月在中国北京市获得了AOT。通过相关分析,PM_(2.5)与AOT(R = 0.8),SO_2(R (= 0.83)和相对湿度(R = 0.81),与NO_2和O_3略有相关,而与气压之间的相关性很小。精度太低,无法建立线性模型来单独预测AOT的地面PM_(2.5)。当结合气态污染物和气象数据时,可获得更准确的线性模型(R〜2从0.64升高到0.93,RMSE从31.2降低到14.1)。如果没有气象数据,使用AOT和SO_2估算地面PM_(2.5)也会取得良好的结果(R〜2 = 0.82,RMSE = 22.6)。与线性模型相比,发现使用反向传播(BP)中性网络模型估计地面PM_(2.5)更合适,因为其RMSE为6.6,远小于线性模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号