首页> 外文期刊>Forum for Social Economics >“Bad” Decisions, Poverty, and Economic Theory: The Individualist and Social Perspectives in Light of “The American Myth”
【24h】

“Bad” Decisions, Poverty, and Economic Theory: The Individualist and Social Perspectives in Light of “The American Myth”

机译:“错误的”决策,贫困与经济理论:基于“美国神话”的个人主义和社会观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social outcomes are analyzed either by placing responsibility for those outcomes on the individual or to locate the cause in a specific social factor – discrimination. Here, I argue that individual decision-making cannot be the cause of poverty, illustrative of one outcome, and that commentary specifying a particular social factor is insufficient to address the fundamental, underlying cause of poverty. Rather, one must examine the nature of the economic system that lies at the root of such issues. In the process of developing the argument, it is shown that the individualist explanation of poverty is linked to the neoclassical framework, and that this individualist explanation is a product of the (capitalist) economic system itself which then induces an ideology both privileging such an explanation and preventing the development of satisfactory theory that would inform proper policy. An example of this point is drawn from the 1960’s “war on poverty” program.
机译:通过将对这些结果的责任放在个人身上或将原因定位在特定的社会因素(歧视)中来分析社会结果。在这里,我认为,个人决策不能成为贫困的原因,只能说明一个结果,而指出特定社会因素的评论不足以解决贫困的根本原因。而是,必须审查作为此类问题根源的经济体系的性质。在论证发展的过程中,表明对贫困的个人主义解释与新古典主义框架相关联,并且这种个人主义解释是(资本主义)经济体系本身的产物,然后引发了意识形态,这两种思想都赋予了这种解释以特权。并阻止令人满意的理论发展为适当的政策提供信息。这方面的一个例子是从1960年的“消除贫困战争”计划中得出的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号