首页> 外文期刊>Foreign affairs >Why Drones Fail When Tactics Drive Strategy
【24h】

Why Drones Fail When Tactics Drive Strategy

机译:为什么战术驱动战略时无人机会失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The war-weary United States, for which the phrase "boots on the ground" has become politically toxic, prefers to eliminate its terrorist foes from the skies. The tool of choice: unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as drones. In Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen-often far away from any battlefield where American troops are engaged-Washington has responded to budding threats with targeted killings. Like any other weapon, armed drones can be tactically useful. But are they helping advance the strategic goals of U.S. counterterrorism? Although terrorism is a tactic, it can succeed only on the strategic level, by leveraging a shocking event for political gain. To be effective, counterterrorism must itself respond with a coherent strategy.
机译:战争厌倦的美国,“在地上穿靴子”一词在政治上具有毒性,它更愿意从空中消除其恐怖敌人。选择的工具:无人驾驶飞行器,也称为无人机。在巴基斯坦,索马里和也门-通常远离美军参与的任何战场-华盛顿已针对有针对性的杀戮采取了应对新威胁的措施。像任何其他武器一样,武装无人机在战术上也很有用。但是它们是否在帮助推进美国反恐的战略目标?尽管恐怖主义是一种战术,但它只有通过利用令人震惊的事件来谋取政治利益,才能在战略层面上取得成功。为了发挥效力,反恐本身必须以一致的战略作出反应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Foreign affairs》 |2013年第4期|44-54|共11页
  • 作者

    Audrey Kurth Cronin;

  • 作者单位

    George Mason University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号