...
首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >Paradigm change?
【24h】

Paradigm change?

机译:范式改变?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sky-high prices on stocks of earnings-less companies. An investment boom into the teeth of a seeming over-supply of goods. Global shocks that barely rattle Wall Street. Is it folly—or are we in a New Economic Paradigm, its rules rewritten by Moore's Law and the infotech revolution? Forbes readers are acutely sensitive to hype. They know business runs in cycles and nothing grows to the sky. Yet there's an enduring case for optimism. It's evident that the many dour warnings of the 1980s about America living beyond its means and due for a dire reckoning were utterly wrong. These jeremiads often were grounded in basic business accounting but somehow they missed an enormous transformation of the economy. Do the doubters of the new valuations and the new rules at the end of the century similarly miss the point?
机译:无收益公司股票价格飞涨。投资热潮似乎使商品供不应求。全球冲击几乎使华尔街不安。这是愚蠢的,还是我们处于“新经济范式”中,其规则被摩尔定律和信息技术革命所重写?福布斯读者对炒作非常敏感。他们知道业务是周期性运行的,没有任何事情可以发展。然而,有一个持久的乐观理由。显而易见的是,1980年代关于美国生活已超出其能力范围,并应引起可怕估计的许多严厉警告是完全错误的。这些耶利米亚人常常以基本的企业会计为基础,但是他们却以某种方式错过了经济的巨大转变。到本世纪末,对新估值和新规则的怀疑者是否也错过了这一点?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |1999年第5期|p.90-92|共3页
  • 作者

    Tim W. Ferguson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界经济问题;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号