首页> 外文期刊>Flying >LET US NOW PRAISE GEORGE CAYLEY
【24h】

LET US NOW PRAISE GEORGE CAYLEY

机译:现在就让我们赞一下乔治·凯利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When some Connecticut boosters recently dusted off the claim that Gustave Whitehead, of the township of Fairfield in that great state, was "first in flight," I, and I suspect quite a few others, emitted the sigh of jaded deja vu. These "who was first" arguments have become pretty tedious. Predictably, the few who were stirred to action by the Whitehead claim trotted out their own candidates: Cldment Ader, Richard Pearse, Karl Jatho, Alberto Santos-Dumont and so on. That all of the usual suspects cluster around the turn of the 20th century is no accident. The basic principles of flight were already understood. Model airplanes and man-carrying gliders existed. Beginning around 1890, when small, powerful gasoline engines became available, there was such a surge in aeronautical experimentation that success was both inevitable and imminent. Being first was a distinction merely of degree.
机译:当一些康涅狄格州的支持者最近驳斥了那个大州费尔菲尔德镇的古斯塔夫·怀特黑德(Gustave Whitehead)“率先飞行”的说法时,我和我怀疑还有很多其他人发出了疲惫的似曾相识的声音。这些“谁是第一人”的论点变得非常乏味。可以预见的是,受到怀特海(Whitehead)要求激起行动的少数人选拔了自己的候选人:克莱德门德(Cldment Ader),理查德·皮尔斯(Richard Pearse),卡尔·贾索(Karl Jatho),阿尔贝托·桑托斯·杜蒙特(Alberto Santos-Dumont)等。所有常见的犯罪嫌疑人都聚集在20世纪之交,这绝非偶然。飞行的基本原理已经被理解。存在飞机模型和载人滑翔机。从1890年左右开始,当小型,强大的汽油发动机问世时,航空试验的兴起使成功既不可避免又迫在眉睫。成为第一只是程度上的区别。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Flying》 |2015年第10期|8082|共2页
  • 作者

    PETER GARRISON;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号