首页> 外文期刊>Fire >Deal or no deal? Devolution drama for chief officers
【24h】

Deal or no deal? Devolution drama for chief officers

机译:成还是不成?首席官下放戏剧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

FIRE: How should fire position itself regarding Police and Crime Commissioners and devolution? [FIRE spoke to Paul prior to the release of the consultation] PH: The main issue for local government and public services in particular is the discussion around devolution deals. It is very clear that the government wants devolution deals for cities and an elected mayor. It's therefore about how fire positions itself locally within those devolution deals and promotes the significant contribution that fire can make on the wider public safety agenda. With devolution, the focus for local authorities is clearly on economic growth, skills, housing employment, transport and transport infrastructure. The big ticket items are the ones they are going to focus on. If you look at the overall budget for fire it's about £1.8-1.9 billion of the total £732 billion public sector spend. Fire, therefore, really is at the bottom of the pile. Accordingly, we need to ensure that our contribution and trusted reputation is brought to the fore and that other organisations sitting at the table in devolution deals really understand the impact that we can make in reducing demand and on the wider public safety and health arena.
机译:火灾:应如何对警察和犯罪专员以及权力下放进行自我射击? [FIRE在磋商发布之前与Paul交谈] PH:地方政府和公共服务的主要问题尤其是关于权力下放交易的讨论。很明显,政府希望为城市和民选市长下放交易。因此,关于火灾如何在这些权力下放协议中局部定位,以及如何促进火灾对更广泛的公共安全议程做出重大贡献。通过权力下放,地方当局的重点显然是经济增长,技能,住房就业,运输和运输基础设施。大门票项目是他们将要重点关注的项目。如果您看一看消防的总体预算,则约占公共部门总支出7,320亿英镑中的1.8-19亿英镑。因此,火确实在堆的底部。因此,我们需要确保我们的贡献和可信赖的声誉脱颖而出,并且在放行交易中坐在桌前的其他组织确实了解我们可以在减少需求以及对更广泛的公共安全与卫生领域产生的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fire》 |2015年第1382期|14-15|共2页
  • 作者

    Paul Hancock;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号