...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire Safety Journal >Empirical Model of flame heat feedback for simulation of cone calorimetry
【24h】

Empirical Model of flame heat feedback for simulation of cone calorimetry

机译:锥形量热法模拟火焰热反馈的经验模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Flame heat feedback was measured in cone calorimeter tests for several polymers to develop a generalized flame model. Polymer samples were squares with 100 mm sides cut from 5,6 to 6.35 mm thick sheets of high-impact polystyrene, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(oxymethylene), and glass-fiber reinforced (25 wt%) poly(butylene terephthalate) with 16 wt% of aluminum diethyl phosphinate. Flame heat flux was measured using water-cooled Schmidt-Boelter gauges in two locations: the sample center and 13.7 mm inwards from one edge of the sample and found to be 11-23 kW m(-2) and 32-49 kW m(-2), respectively. Based on the difference in measured heat flux, a center zone and a side zone were defined. Flame heat fluxes were partitioned into radiative and convective components based on an analysis of the materials' radiative fractions. An average radiative flame heat flux of 9.5 kW m(-2) was determined for the center zone while the side zone was assumed wholly convective. Convective flame heat fluxes were defined by a flame temperature of 2150 K and convective heat transfer coefficients of 3.7 and 20 W m(-2) K-1 for the center and side zones, respectively. Based on an estimate for the convective flame heat flux, the center zone was determined to be a square with 54 mm sides while the remaining area represented the side zone. For validation, the flame model was coupled with well-established pyrolysis parameter sets and implemented into a numerical pyrolysis solver, ThermaKin, to produce the cone calorimetry simulations. The final model is an area-weighted combination of the center and side zone simulations. Both average heat release rate and peak heat release rate were predicted well by the final model. Ignition times for low irradiation were not predicted well initially; oxygen was suspected to be responsible. A correction was made to the ignition times to account for the effect of oxygen and it significantly reduced the error in predicted ignition times.
机译:在锥形量热仪测试中测量了几种聚合物的火焰热反馈,以建立广义的火焰模型。聚合物样品是正方形的,其边长为100毫米,从5,6到6.35毫米厚的高抗冲聚苯乙烯,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯,聚甲醛和玻璃纤维增​​强(25重量%)的聚对苯二甲酸丁二酯片用16重量%的二乙基次膦酸铝。使用水冷Schmidt-Boelter量规在两个位置测量火焰热通量:样品中心和距样品一个边缘向内13.7 mm的地方,发现为11-23 kW m(-2)和32-49 kW m( -2)。基于测量的热通量的差异,定义了中心区域和侧面区域。根据材料的辐射分数分析,火焰热通量分为辐射和对流两部分。确定了中心区域的平均辐射火焰热通量为9.5 kW m(-2),而侧面区域被认为是完全对流的。对流火焰热通量由火焰温度2150 K和中心区域和侧面区域的对流传热系数分别定义为3.7和20 W m(-2)K-1来定义。根据对流火焰热通量的估计,将中心区域确定为边长为54毫米的正方形,而其余区域代表边区域。为了进行验证,将火焰模型与完善的热解参数集结合在一起,并实施到数值热解求解器ThermaKin中,以进行锥量热法模拟。最终模型是中央和侧面区域模拟的面积加权组合。最终模型很好地预测了平均放热率和峰值放热率。最初不能很好地预测低辐射的点火时间。怀疑是氧气造成的。对点火时间进行了校正以考虑氧气的影响,它大大减少了预计点火时间的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号