【24h】

Package of PROTECTION

机译:保护包

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Passive fire protection (PFP) has long played an important role in achieving the fire performance of structural steelwork in buildings. It is used in low-, medium- and high-rise buildings of various occupancy types to achieve fire-resistance ratings for prescriptive design. In the future, however, it is hoped that a risk-based approach to fire resistance design, coupled with robust structural fire design, will become more acceptable. For example, where the risk of a severe fire and structural collapse is shown to be very small, the need for passive PFP could be reduced. But should the risk of a fire be high, more fire protection and structural detailing will be required for the building design. This concept is something that forms the basis of BS EN 1991: 2002: Eurocode 1: Actions on structures: Part 1-2: General actions — Actions on structures exposed to fire, although it is expected to be revised for the UK market, due to concerns with the risk factors proposed. The major next step required is therefore a study and quantification of suitable risk factors for structural fire design.
机译:长期以来,被动防火(PFP)在实现建筑物中钢结构的防火性能方面一直发挥着重要作用。它用于各种居住类型的低,中和高层建筑,以达到防火等级,用于规范性设计。但是,在将来,人们希望基于风险的耐火设计方法以及坚固的结构防火设计将变得更加容易接受。例如,在显示严重火灾和结构倒塌的风险很小的情况下,可以减少对被动PFP的需求。但是,如果发生火灾的风险很高,则建筑物设计将需要更多的防火措施和结构细节。此概念构成了BS EN 1991:2002:欧洲规范1:结构上的动作:第1-2部分:一般动作-暴露于火中的结构上的动作,尽管预计将针对英国市场进行修订。对提议的风险因素的关注。因此,下一步需要的主要步骤是对结构火灾设计的合适风险因素进行研究和量化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号