首页> 外文期刊>Financial history review >Stock volatility, return jumps and uncertainty shocks during the Great Depression
【24h】

Stock volatility, return jumps and uncertainty shocks during the Great Depression

机译:大萧条期间的股票波动,回报跳跃和不确定性冲击

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are a multitude of explanations for the depth and length of the Great Depression, of which uncertainty has been proposed as one possible explanation (Romer 1990). The 1930s not only saw extreme declines in output and prices, but stock volatility was also at record highs (Schwert 1989). This high stock volatility was generated by a series of discontinuous jumps as news about uncertainty arrived regularly during the 1930s, as shown by applying the Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2006) test for jumps in a time-series. To provide a more historical narrative for these jumps, I outline some key events during the Great Depression that generated a sense of uncertainty for businesses and households which occurred contemporaneously to these extreme jumps. While much of the literature has placed Roosevelt's New Deal as a primary source of uncertainty, I do not find much evidence for this hypothesis, and instead find that banking crises, the breakdown of the gold standard, popular unrest and uncertainty related to the brewing war in Europe were primarily responsible for both jumps in returns and the uncertainty of the 1930s.
机译:关于大萧条的深度和持续时间,有多种解释,有人提出不确定性作为一种可能的解释(Romer 1990)。 1930年代不仅产量和价格急剧下降,而且股票的波动性也创下了历史新高(Schwert 1989)。股票价格的高波动性是由一系列不连续的跳跃产生的,因为不确定性的消息在1930年代定期到来,如应用Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard(2006)对时间序列的跳跃所显示的那样。为了提供有关这些跳跃的更具历史意义的叙述,我概述了大萧条期间的一些关键事件,这些事件给企业和家庭带来了不确定性,这些不确定性与这些极端跳跃同时发生。尽管许多文献都将罗斯福的《新政》视为不确定性的主要来源,但我没有为这一假设找到太多证据,而是发现银行业危机,金本位制度的崩溃,民众的不安定以及与酿造战争有关的不确定性在欧洲,这既是回报率飙升又是1930年代的不确定性的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号