【24h】

EDITOR'S CORNER

机译:编辑角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many of the recent problems in the newly underfunded pension, endowment, and foundation world stem from (1) unrealistic return expectations and (2) a desire to spend more than market returns can support. Neither the need for a particular rate of return nor the hope for perFOrmance that can sustain outsized spending allows us to expect that return. Our industry pays scant attention to the concept of "sustainable spending," which is key to effective strategic planning for corporate pensions, public pensions, foundations, and endowments— even for individuals. Sustainable spending typically starts with sustaining the real value of the assets. This step requires realistic return assumptions. We have noted previously that "hope is not a strategy." We need to know how much we can spend on a nearly risk free basis if we want to identify how much of our intended spending is coming from wishful thinking, from mere hope. This knowledge sets the stage for a reasoned, risk-controlled quest for the incremental returns that we hope to achieve.
机译:新近缺乏资金的养老金,捐赠基金和基金会界最近出现的许多问题源于(1)不切实际的回报期望,以及(2)花费超过市场回报所能支持的支出的愿望。无论是对特定回报率的需求,还是对能够维持超支支出的绩效的希望,都无法使我们期望获得这种回报。我们的行业很少关注“可持续支出”的概念,这是有效制定企业养老金,公共养老金,基金会和捐赠基金(甚至对于个人)的战略计划的关键。可持续支出通常始于维持资产的实际价值。此步骤需要现实的回报假设。前面我们已经提到“希望不是战略”。如果我们想确定我们的预期支出中有多少是来自一厢情愿的想法,仅是希望,我们就需要知道我们可以在几乎无风险的基础上支出多少。这些知识为合理,风险控制地寻求我们希望实现的增量回报奠定了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号