首页> 外文期刊>Financial Analysts Journal >Performance Fees: The Good, the Bad, and the (Occasionally) Ugly
【24h】

Performance Fees: The Good, the Bad, and the (Occasionally) Ugly

机译:表演费:好的,坏的和(有时)丑陋的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Performance-based fees are becoming more common in institutional asset management, although much of the asset management community resists this trend. Performance-based fees are neither definitively better nor worse than conventional asset-based fees, and they do not systematically favor the manager or client. Depending on structure, they can be a fair and useful tool to align the interests of a manager with those of the clients, a way for clients to cut their overall fee burden, or a way for an investment manager to expropriate large chunks of client wealth. They can create dangerous revenue volatility for the investment manager—or can be a sensible way to manage an investment firm. Performance-based fees are an interesting blend of fixed fee plus an option.
机译:尽管许多资产管理界都抵制这种趋势,但基于绩效的费用在机构资产管理中变得越来越普遍。基于绩效的费用既不会比传统的基于资产的费用具有绝对的优势或劣势,并且不会系统地偏向经理或客户。根据结构的不同,它们可能是使经理的利益与客户的利益保持一致的公平,有用的工具,是客户减轻总体费用负担的一种方法,还是投资经理占用客户的大部分财富的一种方法。 。它们可能给投资经理带来危险的收入波动,或者是管理投资公司的明智方式。基于绩效的费用是固定费用和选项的有趣组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号