首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects
【24h】

A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects

机译:一种新的简化AHP方法:通过比较成对的几个参考对象为多个对象分配优先级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We propose a development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) permitting to use the methodology also for decision problems with a very large number of alternatives and several criteria. While the application of the original AHP method involves many pairwise comparisons between considered objects. that can be alternatives with respect to considered criteria or criteria between them, our parsimonious proposal is composed of five steps: (i) direct evaluation of the objects at hand: (ii) selection of some reference objects: (iii) application of the original AHP method to the reference objects: (iv) check of the consistency of the pairwise comparisons of AHP and the compatibility between the rating and the prioritization with a subsequent discussion with the decision maker who can modify the rating or pairwise comparisons of reference objects: (v) revision of the direct evaluation on the basis of the prioritization supplied by AHP on reference objects. Our approach permits to avoid the distortion of comparing more relevant objects (reference points) with less relevant objects. Moreover, our AHP approach avoids rank reversal problems, that is. changes of the order in the prioritizations due to adding or removing one or more objects from the set of considered objects. The new proposal has been tested and experimentally validated. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们提议开发一种层次分析法(AHP),该方法允许将方法论也用于具有大量替代方案和几个标准的决策问题。虽然原始AHP方法的应用涉及到所考虑对象之间的许多成对比较。对于考虑的标准或它们之间的标准,它们可以作为替代方案,我们的简约提案包括五个步骤:(i)直接评估现有对象:(ii)选择一些参考对象:(iii)应用原始对象参考对象的AHP方法:(iv)检查AHP的成对比较的一致性以及等级与优先级之间的兼容性,随后与决策者进行讨论,决策者可以修改参考对象的等级或成对比较:( v)根据AHP对参考对象提供的优先级,对直接评估进行修订。我们的方法可以避免比较比较相关的对象(参考点)和较不相关的对象的失真。而且,我们的AHP方法避免了排名反转问题。由于在考虑的对象集中添加​​或删除了一个或多个对象,导致优先级顺序发生了变化。新提案已经过测试和实验验证。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号