首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Intelligence >Cooperative coevolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization: an experimental study
【24h】

Cooperative coevolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization: an experimental study

机译:动态优化的合作式协同进化算法:一项实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we study the cooperative coevolutionary algorithms (CCEAs) for dynamic optimization. We introduce the CCEAs with two popular types of individuals: (1) random immigrants (RIs) that increase the diversity for changing environments, and (2) elitist individuals that increase the local convergence to the optima. The CCEAs are evaluated on a standard suite of benchmark problems and are compared with evolution strategies (ES). Our experimental results show that the CCEAs are efficient in locating and tracking optima in dynamic environments. They are superior to the ES when the RI individuals and the elitist individuals are used. In addition, we empirically investigate how the CCEAs perform with different parameter settings. These settings include collaboration methods, the use of plus–comma selections, and the number of RI individuals and elitist individuals. We also investigate the CCEAs that use a mutative σ-self adaptation. The CCEAs perform the best when they use the best collaboration method and the plus selection. The use of the mutative σ-self adaptation is insignificant. Our results also show that the CCEAs are more scalable than the ES in dynamic environments.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了用于动态优化的合作式协同进化算法(CCEA)。我们将CCEA引入两种流行的个人类型:(1)随机移民(RI),可以增加环境变化的多样性;(2)精英人士,可以使局部趋同达到最佳状态。 CCEA通过一套标准的基准测试问题进行评估,并与演化策略(ES)进行比较。我们的实验结果表明,CCEA在动态环境中可以有效地定位和跟踪最佳状态。当使用RI个人和精英个人时,它们优于ES。此外,我们根据经验研究CCEA在不同参数设置下的性能。这些设置包括协作方法,加号和逗号选择的使用以及RI个人和精英个人的数量。我们还研究了使用变异σ-自我适应的CCEA。 CCEA使用最佳协作方法和加号选择时,它们的表现最佳。变异σ-self自适应的使用是无关紧要的。我们的结果还表明,在动态环境中,CCEA比ES具有更高的可伸缩性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号