首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Biology >Relative Fitness, Teleology, and the Adaptive Landscape
【24h】

Relative Fitness, Teleology, and the Adaptive Landscape

机译:相对适应度,目的论和适应性景观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The metaphor of the adaptive landscape, introduced by Sewall Wright in 1932, has played, and continues to play, a central role in much evolutionary thought. I argue that the use of this metaphor is tied to a teleological view of the evolutionary process, in which natural selection directs evolution toward an improved future state. I argue further that the use of “relative fitnesses” standardized to an arbitrary value, which is closely connected with the metaphor of an adaptive landscape, produces a disconnect between the mean fitness of a population and any real property of that population. This allows for a vague and ill-defined improvement to occur under the influence of selection. Instead, I suggest that relative fitnesses should be standardized by the mean absolute fitness (expected population growth rate), so that they express the expected rate of increase in frequency, rather than number. Under this definition, the mean relative fitness of all populations is always 1.0, and never changes as long as the population continues to exist.
机译:塞瓦尔·赖特(Sewall Wright)于1932年提出的适应性景观的隐喻在许多进化思想中一直发挥着核心作用,并将继续发挥作用。我认为,这种隐喻的使用与进化过程的目的论观点联系在一起,在这种观点中,自然选择将进化引导到一个改善的未来状态。我进一步认为,使用标准化为任意值的“相对适应度”与适应性景观的隐喻紧密相关,会导致总体平均适应度与该人群的任何不动产之间的脱节。这允许在选择的影响下进行模糊而不确定的改进。相反,我建议相对适应度应通过平均绝对适应度(预期的人口增长率)进行标准化,以便它们表达频率的预期增长率,而不是数量。在此定义下,所有总体的平均相对适应度始终为1.0,并且只要总体继续存在就不会改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号