...
首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Biology >How Accurate are Paleoecological Reconstructions of Early Paleontological and Archaeological Sites?
【24h】

How Accurate are Paleoecological Reconstructions of Early Paleontological and Archaeological Sites?

机译:早期古生物学和考古遗址的古生态重建有多准确?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Paleoecology allows construction of paleoenvironmental models, faunal changes and evolutionary trends of paleontological taxa using modern analogs. However, when linking modern analogs to paleontological taxa in paleoecological reconstruction, differential taxonomic preservation in the fossil record has to be taken into account. Paleontologists have known the biased nature of the fossil record since Efremov’s publication on taphonomy in 1940, yet many ecological models of habitats associated with hominins in paleontological and archaeological sites in Africa and elsewhere barely address the complexity of the fossil record. We use randomly sampled ungulates from modern biomes in a comparative taxonomic abundance to demonstrate how the combination of modern thanatocoenoses and taphocoenoses, when used in reference to habitat-specific biocoenosis, produce better inferences of past habitats in paleontological and archaeological sites than approaches currently used.
机译:古生态学允许使用现代类似物构建古环境模型,动物群变化和古生物分类群的演化趋势。但是,在古生态重建中将现代类似物与古生物分类联系起来时,必须考虑到化石记录中的不同分类保存。自从埃夫雷莫夫(Efremov)在1940年发表有关拓朴学的著作以来,古生物学家就知道化石记录的偏向性,但是非洲和其他地方的古生物学和考古遗址中许多与人参相关的生境生态模型几乎没有解决化石记录的复杂性。在比较分类学中,我们使用了来自现代生物群落的随机采样的有蹄类动物,以证明当将现代比纳金龙病和Thopocoenoses的组合用于提及特定于栖息地的生物群落时,如何比当前使用的方法更好地推断古生物学和考古遗址中的过去栖息地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号