首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Comparison of kyphoplasty with use of a calcium phosphate cement and non-operative therapy in patients with traumatic non-osteoporotic vertebral fractures
【24h】

Comparison of kyphoplasty with use of a calcium phosphate cement and non-operative therapy in patients with traumatic non-osteoporotic vertebral fractures

机译:外伤性非骨质疏松性椎体骨折的后凸成形术与磷酸钙骨水泥和非手术治疗的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the current standard treatment options for younger patients with stable traumatic vertebral fractures is conservative treatment using braces. Kyphoplasty as a minimally invasive procedure has been shown to be effective in stabilizing vertebral body fractures, resulting in immediate pain relief and improved physical function. The purpose of this prospective study was to clarify whether patients with acute traumatic vertebral fractures benefit more from kyphoplasty or from conservative treatment with a brace. A prospective study was undertaken in two centers. Forty patients with acute painful traumatic vertebral body fractures type A1–A3 (AO-classification) after adequate trauma, without osteoporosis, suitable for kyphoplasty or therapy by brace were included into the study. Follow-up was 12 months. Patients of the kyphoplasty group showed an immediate beneficial and significant effect postoperatively, and better outcomes 1 and 3 months after operation compared to the conservatively treated group in pain feeling, mobility and vertebral body height. After 12 months the difference between both groups was not significant excepting the vertebral body height. Kyphoplasty provides early and lasting reduction of pain and improvement of daily activity. However, there are clinically asymptomatic cement leakages in up to 45% of which we do not know the consequences in long term. Every patient with traumatic vertebral body fracture treated by kyphoplasty has to be informed about that. Long-time results are outstanding and our findings require confirmation by randomized controlled trials.
机译:对于年轻的稳定外伤性脊椎骨折患者,当前的标准治疗选择之一是使用牙套的保守治疗。后凸成形术作为微创手术已被证明可有效稳定椎体骨折,从而立即缓解疼痛并改善身体机能。这项前瞻性研究的目的是弄清楚急性创伤性椎体骨折患者是从后凸成形术还是支架的保守治疗中获益更多。在两个中心进行了前瞻性研究。适当的创伤后,无骨质疏松症,适合后凸成形术或支架治疗的40例急性疼痛性椎体外伤A1-A3型(AO分类)被纳入研究。随访时间为12个月。后凸成形术组的患者在术后感觉,活动度和椎体高度方面均较保守治疗组显示出立竿见影的有益和显着效果,且术后1和3个月的转归更好。 12个月后,除椎体高度外,两组之间的差异均无统计学意义。后凸成形术可以尽早而持久地减轻疼痛并改善日常活动。但是,临床上无症状的水泥渗漏高达45%,我们不知道长期的后果。必须对每位通过后凸成形术治疗的创伤性椎体骨折的患者进行告知。长期结果是杰出的,我们的发现需要通过随机对照试验进行确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号