首页> 外文期刊>European Sociological Review >The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution—A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden
【24h】

The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution—A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden

机译:合伙解散的经济后果-来自比利时,德国,英国,意大利和瑞典的小组研究的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper analyses the economic consequences of partnership dissolution in different institutional settings. Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden are selected as representatives of four prototypical models of family support (market model, extended family model, male breadwinner model, dual earner model). It is assumed that these four types of family support create specific dependencies within the family, which in case of separation or divorce may have negative economic consequences for the weaker partner. The central question is how much economic autonomy is granted to the weaker family members within each of the four models. Following a thorough discussion of the institutional setting in each of the selected countries, it is assumed that economic autonomy is highest in Sweden and lowest in Italy with Belgium, Germany, and Great Britain ranging in between. Using a cross-national data set of separations developed by the authors from national household panels in these five countries, a large number of partnership dissolutions are studied over time. The observation period is long enough to distinguish short- from long-term consequences of partnership dissolution and in doing so to add to previous comparative research. Using multivariate panel data models it is shown that (i) adjusted household income is affected for both genders; however more negatively for women than for men, (ii) the income decline is highest in Italy and lowest in Sweden, and (iii) British and German women recover rather quickly from the negative economic effects of separation. Sweden stands out as the country with the highest gender equalities with respect to post-separation incomes. However, the model does not convince without having a blemish: in the long run both Swedish men and women have to deal with long-lasting financial consequences after separation, which do not appear to the same extent in any of the other countries.
机译:本文分析了不同制度环境下合伙解散的经济后果。选择了比利时,德国,英国,意大利和瑞典作为家庭支持的四个原型模型(市场模型,大家庭模型,男性养家糊口模型,双重收入者模型)的代表。假定这四种类型的家庭支持会在家庭内部产生特定的依赖性,如果分居或离婚,这可能会对较弱的伴侣产生负面的经济影响。中心问题是,在四个模型中的每个模型中,较弱的家庭成员都享有多少经济自主权。在对每个所选国家/地区的制度设置进行了透彻讨论之后,我们假设经济自主权在瑞典最高,在意大利最低,而比利时,德国和英国则介于两者之间。使用作者从这五个国家的国家住户调查小组开发的跨国分居数据集,随着时间的推移研究了大量合伙解散。观察期足够长,可以将合伙关系解散的短期和长期后果区分开,并以此来补充以前的比较研究。使用多变量面板数据模型显示:(i)调整后的家庭收入对男女都有影响;但是,女性对男性的负面影响要大于男性,(ii)意大利的收入下降最高,瑞典最低,并且(iii)英国和德国的女性从分居带来的负面经济影响中恢复得很快。就分居后的收入而言,瑞典是性别平等最高的国家。但是,该模型不能不带有瑕疵而令人信服:从长远来看,瑞典男人和女人都必须应对分居后的长期财务后果,这在其他任何国家中似乎都没有。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Sociological Review》 |2006年第5期|533-560|共28页
  • 作者单位

    Hans-Jürgen Andreß (to whom correspondence should be addressed) Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Köln Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2 50931 Köln Germany. Email: hja{at}wiso.uni-koeln.de. Barbara Borgloh Fakultät für Soziologie Universität Bielefeld Dekanat Postfach 10 01 31 33501 Bielefeld Germany. Miriam Bröckel Fakultät für Soziologie Universität Bielefeld Dekanat Postfach 10 01 31 33501 Bielefeld Germany. Marco Giesselmann Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Köln Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2 50931 Köln Germany. Dina Hummelsheim Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Köln Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2 50931 Köln Germany.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号