首页> 外文期刊>European Sociological Review >Career Class (Im)mobility of the Social-Cultural Specialists and the Technocrats in the Netherlands
【24h】

Career Class (Im)mobility of the Social-Cultural Specialists and the Technocrats in the Netherlands

机译:荷兰的社会文化专家和技术专家的职业阶层流动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholars have long argued that there are two occupational fractions within the middle class forming two separate classes. They are commonly referred to as the technocrats and the social-cultural specialists. In this article, we distinguish two ‘new’ classes of the high- and low-grade social-cultural specialists and two ‘old’ classes of the high- and low-grade technocrats within the middle class. The classes of the social-cultural specialists are expected to be as closed as the other social classes. If the classes of the social-cultural specialists indeed form ‘new’ classes, they should become more closed over time. Therefore, we investigate whether the social-cultural specialists and the technocrats have different patterns of intragenerational class (im)mobility compared to other classes and whether these patterns change over time. We use Dutch mobility data from 16 representative surveys (n = 12,548). The results strongly support the ‘new’ class division and show that the class of the high-grade social-cultural specialists are more closed than all other social classes. The class of the lower-grade social-cultural specialists is also rather closed and indeed becomes more closed over time.
机译:长期以来,学者一直在争论中产阶级内部有两个构成两个独立阶级的职业部分。他们通常被称为技术专家和社会文化专家。在本文中,我们区分了中高级阶层的两个“新”阶层的高,低档社会文化专家和两个“旧类别”的高,低档技术专家。社会文化专家的课程预计将与其他社会课程一样封闭。如果社交文化专家的课程确实构成“新”课程,则随着时间的流逝,他们应该变得更加封闭。因此,我们调查了与其他类别相比,社会文化专家和技术专家是否具有不同的代际内(不动)流动模式,并且这些模式是否随时间变化。我们使用来自16个代表性调查的荷兰流动性数据(n = 12,548)。结果有力地支持了“新”阶级的划分,并表​​明高级社会文化专家的阶层比所有其他社会阶层的封闭程度更高。较低等级的社会文化专家的班级也相当封闭,并且随着时间的流逝确实变得越来越封闭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号