首页> 外文期刊>European Radiology >Contrast enhancement in multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen: intraindividual comparison of contrast media containing 300 mg versus 370 mg iodine per ml
【24h】

Contrast enhancement in multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen: intraindividual comparison of contrast media containing 300 mg versus 370 mg iodine per ml

机译:腹部多排行计算机断层扫描(MDCT)中的对比度增强:每毫升含300 mg和370 mg碘的造影剂的个体内比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to intraindividually evaluate the difference in intraluminal vessel and parenchyma contrast enhancement of two different iodine concentrations in multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen. Eighty-three patients underwent baseline and follow-up MDCT-scanning (Somatom Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) of the abdomen using contrast media containing 370 mg iodine/ml (protocol A; Ultravist 370, Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) and 300 mg iodine/ml (protocol B; Ultravist 300). The total iodine load (37 g iodine) and the iodine delivery rate (1.29 g iodine/s) were identical for both protocols. Contrast enhancement in the portal venous phase was measured in the abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, liver, spleen, pancreas and kidney. Mean attenuation values were compared using paired t-test. Intraindividual comparison revealed no statistically significant differences of the mean attenuation values between protocols A and B for all anatomic sites: abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, liver, spleen, pancreas and kidney (all P > 0.05). Given an injection protocol with constant total iodine load and constant iodine delivery rate, the iodine concentration of contrast media does not significantly influence abdominal contrast enhancement in the portal venous phase.
机译:这项研究的目的是在腹部的多排计算机断层扫描(MDCT)中,分别评估两种不同碘浓度的管腔内血管和实质对比增强的差异。对八十三名患者进行了基线治疗,并对腹部进行了MDCT扫描(Somatom Sensation 16; Siemens,Forchheim,德国),使用含370 mg碘/ ml的造影剂(方案A; Ultravist 370,拜耳先灵医药公司,柏林,德国) )和300毫克碘/毫升(协议B; Ultravist 300)。两种方案的总碘负荷(37 g碘)和碘输送速率(1.29 g碘/ s)相同。在腹主动脉,下腔静脉,门静脉,肝脏,脾脏,胰腺和肾脏中测量了门静脉期的对比度增强。使用配对t检验比较平均衰减值。个体内比较显示,协议A和协议B在所有解剖部位的平均衰减值在统计学上无显着差异:腹主动脉,下腔静脉,门静脉,肝脏,脾脏,胰腺和肾脏(所有P> 0.05)。给定具有恒定总碘负荷和恒定碘输送速率的注射方案,造影剂的碘浓度不会显着影响门静脉期腹部造影剂的增强。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Radiology》 |2008年第6期|1199-1205|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Bayer Schering Pharma AG Berlin Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch Berlin Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

    Department of Diagnostic Radiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstraße 30 52057 Aachen Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Contrast media; Administration and dosage; Computed tomography; Radiography; Abdominal; Reproducibility of results;

    机译:造影剂;管理和剂量;计算机断层扫描;放射线照相;腹部;结果的可重复性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号