首页> 外文期刊>European Radiology >Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT
【24h】

Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT

机译:与常规的回顾性ECG门控螺旋CT相比,在140 kV的管电压下进行前瞻性ECG触发轴向CT可以在更低的辐射剂量下改善冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的可见性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare coronary 64-slice CT angiography (CTA) protocols, specifically prospective electrocardiograph (ECG)-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated CT acquisition performed using a tube voltage of 140 kV and 120 kV, regarding intracoronary stent imaging. Coronary artery stents (n = 12) with artificial in-stent restenosis (50% luminal reduction, 40 HU) on a cardiac phantom were examined by CT at heart rates of 50–75 beats per minute (bpm). The subjective visibility of in-stent restenosis was evaluated with a three-point scale (1 clearly visible, 2 visible, and 3 not visible), and artificial lumen narrowing [(inner stent diameter − measured lumen diameter)/inner stent diameter], lumen attenuation increase ratio [(in-stent attenuation − coronary lumen attenuation)/coronary lumen attenuation], and signal-to-noise ratio of in-stent lumen were determined. The effective dose was estimated. The artificial lumen narrowing (mean 43%), the increase of lumen attenuation (mean 46%), and signal-to-noise ratio (mean 7.8) were not different between CT acquisitions (p = 0.12–0.91). However, the visibility scores of in-stent restenosis were different (p < 0.05) between ECG-gated CTA techniques: (a) 140-kV prospective (effective dose 4.6 mSv), 1.6; (b) 120-kV prospective (3.3 mSv), 1.8; (c) 140-kV retrospective (16.4–18.8 mSv), 1.9; and (d) 120-kV retrospective (11.0–13.4 mSv), 1.9. Thus, 140-kV prospective ECG-triggered CTA improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with retrospective ECG-gated CTA.
机译:本研究的目的是比较使用140 kV和120 kV管电压进行的冠状动脉64层CT血管造影(CTA)协议,特别是前瞻性心电图(ECG)触发和回顾性ECG门控CT采集, 。通过CT以每分钟50-75次心跳(bpm)的心率检查在心脏幻影上有人工支架内再狭窄(腔内减少50%,40 HU)的冠状动脉支架(n = 12)。使用三点量表(1个清晰可见,2个可见和3个不可见)和人工管腔变窄[(支架内径-测量的管腔直径)/支架内径]评估支架内再狭窄的主观可见性,测定管腔衰减增加率[(支架内衰减-冠状动脉腔衰减)/冠状动脉腔衰减],以及支架内腔的信噪比。估计有效剂量。在两次CT采集之间,人造管腔变窄(平均43%),管腔衰减增加(平均46%)和信噪比(平均7.8)没有差异(p = 0.12-0.91)。但是,在ECG门控CTA技术之间,支架内再狭窄的可见性评分不同(p <0.05):(a)140 kV前瞻性(有效剂量4.6 mSv),1.6; (b)120 kV预期电压(3.3 mSv),1.8; (c)140 kV回顾(16.4-18.8 mSv),1.9; (d)120 kV回顾(11.0–13.4 mSv),1.9。因此,与回顾性ECG门控CTA相比,以140 kV前瞻性ECG触发的CTA在较低的辐射剂量下可改善冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的可见性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号