首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Spatialization Patterns of Translocal Knowledge Networks: Conceptual Understandings and Empirical Evidences of Erlangen and Frankfurt/Oder
【24h】

Spatialization Patterns of Translocal Knowledge Networks: Conceptual Understandings and Empirical Evidences of Erlangen and Frankfurt/Oder

机译:跨地区知识网络的空间化模式:埃尔兰根和法兰克福/奥德的概念理解和经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we outline a perspective on the spatial levels of the organization of high-tech innovations. By contrasting two innovation networks in very different socio-economic regional set-ups—one prospering like in Erlangen, one stagnating like in Frankfurt/Oder—the article presents empirical results of different spatial knowledge formations. We will apply a relational notion of space on the way firm-based strategies are able to acquire external knowledge. The main question is: how do companies in high-tech innovation contexts deal with difficulties of acquiring and organizing external knowledge? Empirically driven results reflect on the possibilities and restrictions of translocal knowledge-transfer with respect to distinct regional context conditions. The point of departure of this article is Faulconbridge's attempt to conceptualize translocal knowledge networks “stretching beyond a local fix” (Faulconbridge, J. (2006) Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms, Journal of Economic Geography, 6, pp. 517-540). Taking into account that innovation-oriented networks extend beyond the firm, the city's administrative ground, person-based social interaction abilities, we will argue for new conceptual understanding of the notion of space as introduced by Coe and Bunnell ((2003) “Spatializing” knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks, Global Networks, 3(4), pp. 437-456). Knowledge workers and their communities are considered to represent the desired and much needed contextual “innovation climate” in urban-regional settings. At the same time, these “long-distance-connections” are of great importance for gaining access to different knowledge forms and expertise. So this paper starts with the assumption, that “learning at a distance” can be as important—and sometimes even more important—as local face-to-face contact when it comes to the question, how to generate new ideas and innovation in the field of high-tech-production. Two contrasting cases within the high-tech sector (Erlangen and Frankfurt/Oder) allow for drawing subordinate conclusions to new forms of gaining external knowledge.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654311003701548
机译:在本文中,我们概述了高科技创新组织的空间层次。通过比较两种在非常不同的社会经济区域设置中的创新网络,“一个像埃尔兰根一样繁荣,而一个像法兰克福/奥德一样停滞不前”,该文章提出了不同空间知识形式的经验结果。我们将在公司战略获取外部知识的方式上应用空间关系概念。主要问题是:处于高科技创新环境中的公司如何应对获取和组织外部知识的困难?以经验为依据的结果反映了跨地区知识转移针对不同地区背景条件的可能性和局限性。本文的出发点是福康布里奇(Faulconbridge)试图概念化“跨越本地知识”的跨本地知识网络(Faulconbridge,J.(2006)将隐性知识延伸到本地知识之外吗?广告专业服务公司的全球学习空间,《经济地理杂志》第6期,第517-540页)。考虑到以创新为导向的网络不仅仅局限于公司,城市的行政区域,基于人的社交互动能力,我们将寻求对新概念的概念理解,如Coe和Bunnell((2003)–知识社区的空间化:迈向跨国创新网络的概念化,全球网络,第3卷第4期,第437-456页)。知识工作者及其社区被认为代表了城市区域环境中理想且迫切需要的“创新气候”。同时,这些“长距离连接”对于获得不同的知识形式和专业知识非常重要。因此,本文始于这样的假设:就问题,如何产生新事物而言,“远距离学习”与本地面对面的接触同样重要,有时甚至更重要。高科技生产领域的思想和创新。在高科技领域(埃尔兰根和法兰克福/奥德)的两个截然不同的案例可以得出对获得外部知识的新形式的从属结论。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654311003701548

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号