首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Planning Inequality: Social and Economic Spaces in National Spatial Planning
【24h】

Planning Inequality: Social and Economic Spaces in National Spatial Planning

机译:规划不平等:国家空间规划中的社会和经济空间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While traces and techniques of power and contestation around the understanding and production of spaces are clearly recognized in the sociological and planning research literature, there has been little rigorous attention to how socio-spatial inequality is put at stake in strategic mobilization around particular spatial imaginaries. In an analysis of the German Spatial Planning Report, the paper examines how inequalities are represented in relation to space and movement in spatial strategy. The analysis shows how, in the report, the spatial dimension of the social is represented as a territorial container, in which the social merges into regional and national entities. Correspondingly, movement is only interpreted as a derived demand, ignoring its integrative aspect as precondition of participation and part of network capital. On the other hand, the spatiality of the economy is represented as something outside and fluid which is meant to be channelled into the territorial containers by means of regional development and spatial planning. These representations of the social suggest a territorialized culturally integrated society as the unquestioned frame of reference which has lost its adequacy and explanatory power against the background of a qualitatively and quantitatively increase of border transgressing relations and movements. However, this view  covers the economic forces producing inequalities and reduces the political space of manoeuvre to redistributions within territorialized socialities, thus sustaining the dominant neoliberal paradigm.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.614388
机译:尽管在社会学和规划研究文献中清楚地认识到了围绕空间的理解和生产的权力和竞争的痕迹和技术,但是对于围绕特定空间虚构的战略动员中如何利用社会空间不平等问题却鲜有严格关注。在对《德国空间规划报告》的分析中,本文研究了在空间策略中与空间和运动有关的不平等现象。分析显示,在报告中,社交的空间维度是如何表示为一个区域容器,社交在其中合并为区域和国家实体。相应地,运动仅被解释为衍生的需求,而忽略了其作为参与和网络资本一部分的前提的综合方面。另一方面,经济的空间性被表示为外部的,流动的东西,通过区域发展和空间规划将其引导到领土容器中。社会的这些表述暗示了一个区域化的文化融合社会,这是毫无疑问的参考框架,在边界越界关系和运动发生质和量增加的背景下,它已经失去了足够的能力和解释力。但是,这种观点涵盖了造成不平等的经济力量,并减少了在地域社会内部重新分配的政治空间,从而维持了新自由主义的主导范式。查看全文::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.614388

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号