首页> 外文期刊>European management journal >How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An Advanced, Reasoned and Organised Literature Review
【24h】

How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An Advanced, Reasoned and Organised Literature Review

机译:如何重新考虑中小企业风险管理?先进,合理的和有组织的文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to reconsider the fundamental role of risk management (RM) in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) by identifying and critically analysing the most important international works; and to define opportunities for further studies by suggesting a different approach to study the topic. This research is based on a new hybrid method developed by the authors, called Advanced, Reasoned and Organised (ARO) literature review, which improves the quality of literature reviews by integrating the systematic review for quantitative papers, the meta-synthesis for qualitative research and the critical interpretative analysis. Forty-eight articles were included in the literature review. Bibliometric and cluster analyses were carried out. Two hypotheses were applied as filters in the interpretative synthesis of the content and guided the analysis to answer two research questions. The findings underline that RM in SMEs is still a 'spot' subject as they put little effort into the risk identification, assessment and monitoring. The lack of procedures and strategies is due to the lack of risk mindfulness and knowledge, and it is related to the managers' and owners' risk attitudes. It is fundamental to understand why risk procedures are not implemented and to find a way to raise awareness of the potential benefits of risk and control measures. The topic is current, and the multidisciplinary perspective and mixed-method approach enhance both theoretical and practical contributions for academics and SME owners. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是两倍:重新考虑风险管理(RM)在中小企业(中小企业)中的基本作用通过识别和批判性地分析最重要的国际作品;并通过建议采用不同的方法来确定进一步研究的机会。本研究基于作者开发的新的混合方法,称为先进,合理的和组织(ARO)文献综述,通过整合定量论文的系统评审,定性研究的META合成来提高文献审查的质量。批判性解释性分析。文献综述中包含四十八篇文章。进行了生物计量和聚类分析。在含量的解释性合成中,将两个假设应用于过滤器并引导分析回答两项研究问题。在下划线中,中小企业的调查结果仍然是一个“现场”主体,因为它们很少地努力识别,评估和监测。缺乏程序和策略是由于缺乏风险的心态和知识,它与管理人员和业主的风险态度有关。理解为什么没有实施风险程序并找到一种提高风险和控制措施潜在利益的方法,这是至关重要的。该主题是当前的,多学科视角和混合方法方法提高学者和中小企业所有者的理论和实践贡献。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号