首页> 外文期刊>European journal of political economy >The Role of Regime Type in the Political Economy of Foreign Reserve Accumulation
【24h】

The Role of Regime Type in the Political Economy of Foreign Reserve Accumulation

机译:体制类型在外汇储备积累的政治经济学中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Authoritarian regimes have surpassed democracies in foreign reserve accumulation since the Asian Financial Crisis. Two prominent institutionalist theories could explain this diverging trend in reserves: First, the political business cycle theory, suggesting that reserves are reduced before an election. Second, the veto player theory, implying that a high number of veto players increases the de facto independence of central bankers, who are reluctant to invest in reserves. A time-series cross-sectional analysis for up to 182 countries over the period 1990-2013 shows that democratic governments tend to reduce their reserves before elections. While veto players do not affect reserves directly, a high number of veto players tends to limit a political business cycle before an election. Elections and veto players do not have an influence in authoritarian regimes. Election cycles tend to explain why democracies have relatively fallen behind in a period of massive reserve accumulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自亚洲金融危机以来,威权政体的外汇储备积累已超过民主国家。两种著名的制度主义理论可以解释这种储备差异的趋势:首先,政治经济周期理论,表明在大选之前减少储备。第二,否决权参与者理论,这意味着大量的否决权参与者提高了中央银行的事实上的独立性,他们不愿投资储备。对1990年至2013年期间多达182个国家进行的时间序列横截面分析表明,民主政府倾向于在选举前减少储备。尽管否决权人不会直接影响储备金,但大量的否决权人往往会限制选举前的政治经济周期。选举和否决权对专制政权没有影响。选举周期往往可以解释为什么在大量储备积累期间民主制相对落后。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号