首页> 外文期刊>European journal of marketing >How far is too far? Investigating purchasing across packaged goods and services categories for retailer branded products
【24h】

How far is too far? Investigating purchasing across packaged goods and services categories for retailer branded products

机译:多远才算远?调查针对零售商品牌产品的包装商品和服务类别的购买

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Retailers are increasingly adding banks, gas stations, mobile services and even real estate agencies to their portfolio and branding these new ventures with the retailer name, such as Tesco Bank or Asda Money. The purpose of this paper is to test the ability of a retailer brand to stretch from traditional packaged goods categories to very different categories such as banking. Design/methodology/approach Using data from an online survey collected from 953 UK grocery buyers, this paper examines consumers' behaviour towards UK retailer brands across four categories: soft drinks, chocolate, fuel and banking. Findings The results show that cross-category retailer brand purchasing is stronger between categories with similar buying behaviour (e.g. soft drinks and chocolate) than in categories with very different buying behaviour (e.g. soft drinks and banking). The behavioural spill over effects are stronger for retailer brands from the same chain and persist even for unrelated categories. However, apart from fuel, the strongest cross-purchasing occurs across competing retailer-branded offers within the same category. Research limitations/implications - The main implication of this study is that behavioural spill overs for retailer brands are possible even between unrelated categories. The finding about the effects being strongest within a given chain implies that umbrella branded strategy is a key to take advantage of the effects. Practical implications - These findings extend past literature about the cross-category buying of umbrella branded store brands to very different categories. This paper highlights the challenges retailers face regarding their ability to extend the retailer brand across categories. The findings also provide insights for cross-selling retailer brands in unrelated categories to current store brand buyers. Originality/value - This is the first study to examine the use of retailer brands across a wide spectrum of categories from Soft Drinks to Fuel.
机译:目的零售商越来越多地在其投资组合中增加银行,加油站,移动服务甚至房地产代理商,并以零售商的名称(例如乐购银行(Tesco Bank)或阿斯达·钱(Asda Money))对这些新企业进行品牌化。本文的目的是测试零售商品牌从传统包装商品类别扩展到非常不同的类别(例如银行业)的能力。设计/方法论/方法本文使用从953个英国杂货采购商处收集的在线调查数据,研究了消费者对英国零售商品牌的行为,涉及以下四个类别:软饮料,巧克力,燃料和银行业务。结果结果表明,具有类似购买行为的类别(例如,软饮料和巧克力)之间的跨类别零售商品牌购买要强于具有非常不同购买行为的类别(例如,软饮料和银行业)之间的跨类别零售商品牌购买。行为溢出效应对于来自同一连锁店的零售商品牌更强,甚至对于不相关的类别也持续存在。但是,除了燃料外,最强的交叉购买发生在同一类别中竞争性的零售商品牌报价之间。研究的局限性/含义-这项研究的主要含义是,即使在不相关的类别之间,零售商品牌的行为溢出也是可能的。关于在给定链中效果最强的发现表明,伞形品牌战略是利用这些效果的关键。实际意义-这些发现将过去有关伞形品牌商店品牌的跨类别购买的文献扩展到非常不同的类别。本文重点介绍了零售商在扩展零售商品牌跨类别能力方面面临的挑战。这些发现还为与当前商店品牌购买者无关的交叉销售零售商品牌提供了见解。原创性/价值-这是第一项研究零售商品牌使用情况的研究,涉及从软饮料到燃料的各种类别。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European journal of marketing》 |2019年第1期|108-120|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Univ South Australia, Ehrenberg Bass Inst Mkt Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia;

    Univ South Australia, Ehrenberg Bass Inst Mkt Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Retailing;

    机译:零售业;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号