首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of International Law >Terrorist Crimes and International Co-operation: Critical Remarks on the Definition and Inclusion of Terrorism in the Category of International Crimes
【24h】

Terrorist Crimes and International Co-operation: Critical Remarks on the Definition and Inclusion of Terrorism in the Category of International Crimes

机译:恐怖主义犯罪与国际合作:关于恐怖主义在国际犯罪类别中的定义和纳入的批判性评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Notwithstanding the emphasis placed on the need for concerted international action to confront the problem of terrorism, positive international law is far from treating the issue of defining the criminal notion of terrorism coherently; the discussion of such a notion is being made hostage [sic!] to the abuse of the term ‘terrorism’ in the course of the debate and to the confusion between an empirical description of a phenomenon and its treatment under criminal law. Proposing a core-definition approach, this article elaborates a notion based upon the basic rights of civilians and on the unacceptability of their violation by terrorist methods carried out by private organized groups. The definition proposed here, which does not recognize in the perpetrator’s motivations any material relevance because of the overwhelming importance of the value infringed, is able to minimize the relevance of some abused arguments (such as state terrorism or the treatment of ‘freedom fighters’), could quickly gain customary status and would prove useful in interpretation and in drafting exercises, both at international and national level. As for the inclusion of terrorism in the category of international crimes, it is submitted that two interpretive options are open: to consider the category of crimes against humanity as already able to embrace core terrorism; or to place the strong rationale underlying the stigmatization of terrorist crimes in the perspective of the gradual emerging of a discrete international crime of terrorism. National case law seems to point to the latter option, but the question does not appear settled: for this reason, the discussion regarding the prospect of an amendment to the ICC Statute expressly to include terrorist crimes continues to be of interest. An express inclusion could be useful to avoid doubts or discrepancies at national level and to solve some outstanding issues of the international community's criminal policy.
机译:尽管强调必须采取协调一致的国际行动来应对恐怖主义问题,但积极的国际法远未统一处理界定恐怖主义犯罪概念的问题;对这种概念的讨论被当作争论的焦点,因为在辩论过程中滥用了“恐怖主义”一词,以及对现象的实证描述及其在刑法下的处理之间的混淆。提出了一种核心定义方法,本文基于平民的基本权利以及基于私人有组织团体实施的恐怖手段对平民的侵犯行为的不可接受性,阐述了一个概念。此处提出的定义由于侵犯了价值的绝对重要性而没有在犯罪者的动机中认识到任何实质意义,因此能够使某些滥用论点(例如国家恐怖主义或对“自由战士”的对待)的相关性最小化。可以很快获得习惯地位,并且在国际和国家层面的解释和起草活动中都将很有用。关于将恐怖主义列入国际罪行类别,有两个解释性选择是开放的:将危害人类罪类别视为已经能够接受核心恐怖主义;或从逐渐出现一种离散的国际恐怖主义罪行的角度出发,将有理由为恐怖主义罪行蒙上阴影。国家判例法似乎指向了后一种选择,但问题似乎并未解决:因此,关于《国际刑事法院规约》明确包括恐怖主义罪行的修正案的前景的讨论仍然引起人们的兴趣。明确列入可能有助于避免在国家一级产生疑问或差异,并解决国际社会刑事政策中的一些悬而未决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号