【24h】

Editorial

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This issue of the Journal addresses an important range of topics. Although all engage with the increasing difficulties confronting efforts to sustain the social regulation of work and employment in hard times, some of the authors draw more optimistic conclusions than others. The 'turn to organizing' by European trade unions has long been debated. Almost universally, membership decline has weakened unions, and US-inspired methods of active organizing have been increasingly embraced as a solution. The most cited instances to date have been by Western European Union (EU), but Adam Mrozowicki shows that in the last two decades the approach has also been adopted in Central and Eastern Europe. In a study which examines four countries and two contrasting sectors, he finds considerable diversity in the degree to which organizing has been embraced and the approaches adopted. Differences in institutional contexts and available resources form part of the explanation, but the strategic choices of key actors are also of key significance: a factor particularly important because in most cases the policies adopted are very decentralized.
机译:本期《期刊》探讨了一系列重要主题。尽管所有人都在艰难时期为维持工作和就业的社会监管而面临越来越多的困难,但有些作者得出的结论比其他人更为乐观。长期以来,欧洲工会就“转向组织”进行了辩论。几乎普遍而言,会员人数的减少削弱了工会,并且越来越多地采用美国启发性的主动组织方法作为解决方案。迄今为止,引用最多的实例是西欧联盟(EU),但亚当·姆罗佐维奇(Adam Mrozowicki)表明,在过去的二十年中,中欧和东欧也采用了这种方法。在对四个国家和两个截然不同的部门进行考察的研究中,他发现组织接受程度和采用的方法存在很大差异。制度背景和可用资源的差异构成了解释的一部分,但是关键角色的战略选择也具有关键意义:这一因素特别重要,因为在大多数情况下,所采用的政策非常分散。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号