...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases >Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis

机译:实时定量PCR检测与临床和革兰氏染色鉴定细菌性阴道病的诊断准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis versus the standard methods, the Amsel criteria and the Nugent score. The Amsel criteria, the Nugent score, and results from the molecular tool were obtained independently from vaginal samples of 163 pregnant women who reported abnormal vaginal symptoms before 20 weeks gestation. To determine the performance of the molecular tool, we calculated the kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Either or both of the Amsel criteria (≥3 criteria) and the Nugent score (score ≥7) indicated that 25 women (15%) had bacterial vaginosis, and the remaining 138 women did not. DNA levels of Gardnerella vaginalis or Atopobium vaginae exceeded 109 copies/mL or 108 copies/mL, respectively, in 34 (21%) of the 163 samples. Complete agreement between both reference methods and high concentrations of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae was found in 94.5% of women (154/163 samples, kappa value = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70–0.81). The nine samples with discordant results were categorized as intermediate flora by the Nugent score. The molecular tool predicted bacterial vaginosis with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 73%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The quantitative real-time PCR assay shows excellent agreement with the results of both reference methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析在诊断细菌性阴道病中与标准方法,Amsel标准和Nugent评分相比的诊断准确性。 Amsel标准,Nugent得分和分子工具的结果独立于163名孕妇在怀孕20周前报告异常阴道症状的阴道样本而获得。为了确定分子工具的性能,我们计算了kappa值,敏感性,特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。 Amsel标准(≥3个标准)和Nugent得分(评分≥7)中的一项或两项均表明25名妇女(15%)患有细菌性阴道病,其余138名妇女没有。在163个样本中,阴道加德纳菌或阴道Atopobium的DNA水平分别超过10 9 拷贝/ mL或10 8 拷贝/ mL。 94.5%的女性(154/163个样本,kappa值= 0.81,95%的置信区间0.70-0.81)中发现两种参考方法与高浓度的阴道加德纳斯菌和阴道加曲霉菌完全一致。根据Nugent评分,将结果不一致的9个样本分类为中间菌群。该分子工具预测细菌性阴道病的敏感性为100%,特异性为93%,阳性预测值为73%,阴性预测值为100%。实时定量PCR分析与两种参考方法的细菌性阴道病诊断结果均显示出极好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号