...
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Kelly v GE Healthcare Ltd (February 11, 2009): Pharmaceutical Companies at Risk of Successful Employee Inventor Compensation Claim Following Landmark Ruling
【24h】

Kelly v GE Healthcare Ltd (February 11, 2009): Pharmaceutical Companies at Risk of Successful Employee Inventor Compensation Claim Following Landmark Ruling

机译:Kelly诉GE Healthcare Ltd(2009年2月11日):具有里程碑意义的裁决后,制药公司面临成功向员工提出发明人赔偿的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The pharmaceutical industry is facing testing times, with many of the major players looking to balance the shortages in their "drug pipelines" and increased costs of development, with the need to cut costs across the board. They now also risk successful compensation claims being brought against them by their own employee inventors.rnUnder s.40 of the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977), an employee is entitled to a compensation award having made an invention for which a patent is granted where that patent is of "outstanding benefit" to the employer.1 Until now, s.40 has been regarded as a provision that placed an unattainable threshold upon the employee relying on it and therefore of little practical value. This was reflected in the fact that no employee had been successful in being awarded compensation under the section.
机译:制药行业正面临着测试的时代,许多主要参与者希望平衡其“药品管道”的短缺和开发成本的增加,以及全面削减成本的需求。现在,他们也冒着自己的雇员发明人成功向他们提出赔偿要求的风险。根据《 1977年专利法》(PA 1977)第40条的规定,雇员在发明了一项专利的情况下有权获得赔偿该专利对用人单位而言是“突出的利益”。1直到现在,第40条仍被视为对依靠它的雇员设定了难以企及的门槛,因此几乎没有实用价值。这反映在以下事实上:没有任何一名雇员成功地获得该款下的赔偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号