首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Biodiversity Conservation Access and Benefit-sharing Contracts and the Role and Place of Patents
【24h】

Biodiversity Conservation Access and Benefit-sharing Contracts and the Role and Place of Patents

机译:生物多样性保护获取和惠益分享合同以及专利的作用和位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Access and benefit-sharing was a key objective of the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Implementing this objective in Australia has seen the adoption of a contract model where the terms and condition and price of access are negotiated between the bioprospector and the resource holder. Patents are apart of the price. This article assesses the place of patents in theory and in practice through the examples of the Craig Venter Institute contract and the Griffith and AstraZeneca Partnership agreement(s) in Australia. The article concludes that there is little evidence that benefits flow to conservers and curators of in situ biodiversity (such as protected areas) and that uncertain property and use rights from patents may be further reducing the value bioprospectors are likely to pay to access and use biodiversity.
机译:获取和惠益分享是《联合国生物多样性公约》(CBD)的主要目标。在澳大利亚实现这一目标的过程中,已经采用了合同模式,在该模式中,生物勘探者与资源持有者之间就获取的条款和条件以及价格进行了谈判。专利是价格的一部分。本文以Craig Venter研究所合同以及澳大利亚的Griffith和AstraZeneca Partnership协议为例,评估了专利在理论上和实践上的地位。该文章的结论是,几乎没有证据表明收益流向原地生物多样性的保存者和管理者(例如保护区),并且专利的不确定财产和使用权可能会进一步降低生物勘探者为获取和使用生物多样性所可能付出的价值。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号