首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Copyright the Non-Reaping Sickle! Why Doesn't the Copyright Account of Profits Remedy Reap the Architect His Profit
【24h】

Copyright the Non-Reaping Sickle! Why Doesn't the Copyright Account of Profits Remedy Reap the Architect His Profit

机译:版权非收割镰刀!为什么利润救济的版权帐户无法获得建筑师的利润

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines why account of profits is not the remedy of choice in architects 'plan decisions. It argues that industry factors, the role of the architect, the free use of concepts and ideas in the industry mean that copyright does not reap the architect his profit. Ultimately account of profits is being used as restitutionary damages in the project home market, and the article argues that the remedy of account of profits in its restitutionary meaning should be a remedy for unique buildings.
机译:本文研究了为什么利润账户不是建筑师计划决策中的选择补救措施。它认为,行业因素,建筑师的角色,行业中概念和思想的自由使用都意味着版权不能使建筑师获利。最终,利润账户被用作项目本国市场的归还损害,文章认为,归还意义上的利润账户的补救措施应该是独特建筑物的补救措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号