首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Prior Art before Patent: The Only Way to Instruct Expert Witnesses in Patent Cases?
【24h】

Prior Art before Patent: The Only Way to Instruct Expert Witnesses in Patent Cases?

机译:专利之前的现有技术:专利案件中指示专家证人的唯一方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Expert witnesses can make or break patent cases. Choosing the right expert, and ensuring that their evidence is persuasive, is key. Patent lawyers know that a finding by the court that an expert has exercised hindsight in coming to a view on obviousness is potentially fatal to a claim's success. But experts must understand both the patent in suit and the prior art. So which should they be shown first? This article considers recent conflicting decisions from the English High Court patent judges which have made the task of ensuring that the expert's evidence stands up at trial harder than ever.
机译:专家证人可以提出或破坏专利案件。选择合适的专家并确保他们的证据具有说服力是关键。专利律师知道,法院裁定专家对证据的明显性进行过事后调查后,可能会对索赔的成功造成致命的影响。但是专家们必须了解诉讼专利和现有技术。那么应该先显示哪个?本文考虑了英国高等法院专利法官最近做出的相互矛盾的裁决,这些裁决的任务是确保专家的证据比以往任何时候都更加坚决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号