首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Ultraman Vanquished Aston Martin and Bentley: Japanese Trade Mark Opposition and Invalidation Outcomes and Trends
【24h】

Ultraman Vanquished Aston Martin and Bentley: Japanese Trade Mark Opposition and Invalidation Outcomes and Trends

机译:奥特曼征服了阿斯顿·马丁和本特利:日本商标异议和无效结果与趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article will explore an interesting trade mark opposition decision which demonstrates that the outsized reputation and fame of the opponents' senior marks per se neither enhances nor reduces the likelihood of confusion in Japan, but rather the factual determination and judgment of the similarity examination of the conflicting marks is the main driver of success in contentious trade mark proceedings. The article will also explore the procedural pitfalls, strategic shortcomings and 17 years of statistical data regarding Japan's trade mark opposition system and several instructive Japanese appellate invalidation decisions that will demonstrate why brand owners will be better served by using its invalidation appeal system to police competitors' trade marks in the world's third largest economy, Japan.
机译:本文将探讨一个有趣的商标异议决定,该决定表明,反对者的高级商标本身的声誉和名气过大,既不会增强也不会减少在日本造成混淆的可能性,而是对商标相似性审查的事实确定和判断。商标冲突是争议商标诉讼成功的主要动力。本文还将探讨有关日本商标异议制度的程序缺陷,战略缺陷和17年的统计数据,以及一些具有指导意义的日本上诉无效判决,这将说明为什么通过使用其无效上诉系统来监督竞争对手的商标可以更好地为品牌所有者提供服务世界第三大经济体日本的商标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号