...
首页> 外文期刊>European environmental law review >Contaminated Land: The Impact of Two UK Landmark Cases
【24h】

Contaminated Land: The Impact of Two UK Landmark Cases

机译:受污染的土地:两个英国地标案件的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article analyses two landmark cases involving contaminated land in the UK. As the UK's contaminated land regime is relatively new there has only been two appeal cases to date. This article considers how these two cases impact on the interpretation and application of liability-determining provisions of the contaminated land regime. In addition, practical implications of these judgments are also discussed. Finally, we review how the cases can be reconciled and what this might mean for the regime's future and effectiveness. The two recent High Court cases involving the contaminated land regime (Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990), are: 1. R (on the application of the National Grid Gas plc) (formerly Transco Plc) v Environment Agency (2006), ( "the National Grid Gas case"); and 2. Circular Facilities (London) Ltd v Sevenoaks District Council (2005), (the "Circular Facilities" case).
机译:本文分析了两个涉及英国受污染土地的标志性案例。由于英国受污染的土地制度相对较新,因此迄今为止只有两个上诉案件。本文考虑了这两种情况如何影响受污染土地制度中确定责任的规定的解释和应用。此外,还讨论了这些判断的实际含义。最后,我们回顾了如何调和案件以及这对于该政权的未来和有效性可能意味着什么。高等法院最近发生的两起涉及受污染的土地制度的案件(1990年《环境保护法》第IIA部分)是:1. R(根据National Grid Gas plc的申请)(原Transco Plc)诉环境署(2006年), (“国家电网瓦斯案”); 2.循环设施(伦敦)有限公司诉Sevenoaks区议会(2005年)(“循环设施”案)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号