首页> 外文期刊>European energy and environmental law review >Municipal Solid Waste in European Waste-to-Energy Operations - Questions of Classification and Consistency
【24h】

Municipal Solid Waste in European Waste-to-Energy Operations - Questions of Classification and Consistency

机译:欧洲废物转化为能源的城市固体废物-分类和一致性问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The burning of MSW and MSW-based materials such as RDF and SRF offers a means of producing energy in accordance with the waste hierarchy laid down in Article 4 of the WFD. These quite heterogenetic waste streams have a lot of potential in energy production because of the large quantities produced and the fact that they have no other viable uses. The large need for supply in WtE operations works as a strong incentive to conclude long-term contracts with public or private sector parties. The possibilities of MSW ceasing to be waste are fairly limited. The criteria for by-product status does not fit MSW products since they are not produced as an integral part of the operation but bought elsewhere pursuant to sales contracts. MSW-based fuels can cease to be waste through end-of-waste criteria when their quality and emissions can be controlled. That is why the possibilities for WtE materials to cease to be waste lie with the waste streams where the quality and emissions can better be assessed in advance because of standardisation such as SRF standardisation. The standards have to be strict enough to comply with the applicable legislation and not create adverse environmental or human health effects after the material is no longer waste. Besides the material, the operation itself has an important part to play in the materials ceasing to be waste. The absolute precondition even to consider materials as no longer waste is that the WtE operation should be considered as a recovery operation and not a disposal operation. A recovery operation in WtE needs to comply with the criteria developed in the case-law as well as fulfilling the energy efficiency standards laid down in paragraph R1 of Annex Ⅱ of the WFD or somewhere else. If the energy efficiency cannot be shown the waste materials burned are always considered waste and the operation is considered to be on the lowest level of the waste hierarchy. The biodegradable part of the solid waste produces renewable energy, even when the final energy production is done through gasification and burning the gas manufactured from the waste. It would seem that a great part of waste-based energy is renewable even in the more heterogenic waste streams. However, because of this heterogeneity the content of the deliveries may differ from time to time even with SRF. Thus it is important for operators and suppliers to make their responsibilities and costs clear in their sales contracts.
机译:焚烧MSW和基于MSW的材料(例如RDF和SRF)提供了一种根据WFD第4条规定的废物等级生产能源的方法。这些异质性废物流由于产生的量大以及它们没有其他可行的用途而在能源生产中具有很大的潜力。 WtE运营中对供应的巨大需求强烈激励与公共或私营部门方签订长期合同。都市固体废物不再成为废物的可能性是相当有限的。副产品状态的标准不适合MSW产品,因为它们不是作为运营的组成部分生产的,而是根据销售合同在其他地方购买的。当可以控制基于MSW的燃料的质量和排放时,可以通过废物终结标准停止其废物。这就是为什么WtE材料不再成为废物的可能性在于废物流,由于诸如SRF标准化之类的标准化工作,可以更好地预先评估质量和排放。这些标准必须足够严格,以符合适用的法规,并且在材料不再浪费后也不会对环境或人类健康造成不利影响。除了材料之外,操作本身在材料不再浪费方面也起着重要的作用。甚至将物料视为不再浪费的绝对前提是,WtE操作应被视为回收操作,而不是处置操作。 WtE中的回收操作需要符合判例法中制定的标准,并满足WFD附件ⅡR1或其他地方规定的能效标准。如果无法显示能源效率,则燃烧的废物始终被视为废物,并且该操作被视为处于废物等级的最低级别。固体废物的可生物降解部分产生可再生能源,即使最终的能源生产是通过气化和燃烧废物产生的气体来完成的。看来,即使在异质性废物流中,大部分基于废物的能源也是可再生的。但是,由于这种异质性,即使使用SRF,交货内容也可能会不时发生变化。因此,对于运营商和供应商而言,在销售合同中明确其责任和成本很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号