首页> 外文期刊>Europe-Asia Studies >'Selective Affinities': The Reactions of the Council of Europe and the European Union to the Second Armed Conflict in Chechnya (1999 - 2006)
【24h】

'Selective Affinities': The Reactions of the Council of Europe and the European Union to the Second Armed Conflict in Chechnya (1999 - 2006)

机译:“选择性关系”:欧洲委员会和欧盟对车臣第二次武装冲突的反应(1999年至2006年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article aims to compare how the main bodies of the European Union and the Council of Europe reacted to the issues raised by the armed conflict in Chechnya: human rights violations; the necessity (or otherwise) of political negotiations between the Chechens and the Russians; and Chechen terrorism. While the requests for political negotiations were quickly dropped by nearly all organs of the Council of Europe (CoE) and European Union (EU), the issue of human rights abuses uncovered a chasm between the legislative and decision-making bodies. The terrorist acts had no impact on either the EU's or the CoE's definition of the conflict in Chechnya, but they did influence EU policy. In sum, this comparison suggests the presence of 'selective affinities' between the CoE and EU bodies depending on the issue involved.
机译:本文旨在比较欧洲联盟和欧洲委员会的主要机构如何应对车臣武装冲突引发的问题:侵犯人权;车臣人与俄国人之间进行政治谈判的必要性(或其他方式);和车臣恐怖主义。尽管欧洲委员会(CoE)和欧洲联盟(EU)的几乎所有机构都迅速放弃了进行政治谈判的要求,但侵犯人权的问题却暴露出立法机构和决策机构之间的鸿沟。恐怖主义行为对欧盟或欧洲共同体对车臣冲突的定义都没有影响,但确实影响了欧盟政策。总而言之,这种比较表明,根据所涉及的问题,欧洲委员会与欧盟机构之间存在“选择亲和力”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Europe-Asia Studies》 |2008年第2期|317-338|共22页
  • 作者

    Cline Francis;

  • 作者单位

    Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB),;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号