...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Disciplining Nature: The Homogenising and Constraining Forces of Anti-Markets on the Food System
【24h】

Disciplining Nature: The Homogenising and Constraining Forces of Anti-Markets on the Food System

机译:纪律性质:反市场对食物系统的同质化和约束力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To understand the changing patterns within agriculture, it is important to look not only at social relations and organisational configurations. Also salient to such an analysis is an examination of how those formations give shape to non-humans. Much attention has been placed recently on the political economy of agriculture when speaking of these emergent patterns. Yet in doing this, the natural environment is all too often relegated to the backdrop; where the agro-economy is viewed as something that manoeuvres within the environment but never through it. The conceptual groundwork for this paper draws from two often unconnected scholars: Michel Foucault and Fernand Braudel. In Foucault, we find a framework, with a little conceptual development, through which to talk about how the economy (of both discipline and capital) enters into nature. Specifically, the argument is made that through the embodiment of discipline, nature too becomes disciplined. Yet in Foucault we find a discursive conception of socio-economic history; where capitalism is discussed, but always as an effect of the discursive structures of power/knowledge. Enter the work of Braudel, to provide us with a materialist counterweight to Foucault's theorising. In Braudel, we find a detailed analysis on the emergence of capitalism, out of which then comes his distinction between markets and anti-markets. In short, when both accounts of history are overlaid, interesting connections between the emergence of Braudelian anti-markets and Foucaultian discipline are revealed. Two brief case studies are then examined to add further depth to the discussion: the first focusing on corn; the second centring on the cow. The paper then concludes speaking on the issue of resistance.
机译:要了解农业中不断变化的模式,不仅要关注社会关系和组织结构,这一点也很重要。对此类分析也很重要的是检查这些构造如何使非人类成形。在谈到这些新兴模式时,最近已将很多注意力放在农业的政治经济学上。然而,这样做常常使自然环境沦为背景。在这里,农业经济被视为在环境中操纵但从未通过它进行操纵的事物。本文的概念基础来自于两个经常没有联系的学者:米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)和费尔南·布劳德尔(Fernand Braudel)。在福柯,我们发现了一个在概念上有所发展的框架,通过该框架可以讨论(学科和资本的)经济如何融入自然。具体而言,有人提出通过纪律的体现,自然也将受到纪律约束。然而在福柯,我们发现了一种对社会经济历史的话语概念。在这里讨论了资本主义,但总是受到权力/知识的话语结构的影响。进入Braudel的著作,为我们提供与福柯的理论相称的唯物主义的砝码。在布劳德尔,我们对资本主义的出现进行了详细的分析,然后他从资本主义的市场与反市场之间进行区分。简而言之,当两个历史记录都重叠时,就揭示了布劳德里亚式反市场的出现与福柯式纪律之间的有趣联系。然后研究了两个简短的案例研究,以使讨论更加深入:第一个重点是玉米;第二个重点是玉米。第二个以母牛为中心。然后,论文结束了对抵抗问题的发言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号