首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >De-Domestication: Ethics at the Intersection of Landscape Restoration and Animal Welfare
【24h】

De-Domestication: Ethics at the Intersection of Landscape Restoration and Animal Welfare

机译:去本土化:景观恢复与动物保护相交的伦理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

De-domestication is the deliberate establishment of a population of domesticated animals or plants in the wild. In time, the population should be able to reproduce, becoming self-sustainable and incorporating 'wild' animals. Often de-domestication is part of a larger nature restoration scheme, aimed at creating landscapes anew, or re-creating former habitats. De-domestication is taken up in this paper because it both engages and raises questions about the major norms governing animals and nature. The debate here concerns whether animals undergoing de-domestication should be looked upon as wild or non-wild and the effect this has on questions about how they should be treated. It also concerns the value of nature, and the kind and degree of nature management considered appropriate. The paper first describes actual de-domestication practices and considers the character of human duties to animals in process of de-domestication. Secondly, the paper explores the implications of de-domestication for nature management, focusing on notions of naturalness and wildness. Finally, because the current division of ethical topics, with its dependence upon whether animals and nature are domesticated, hampers rather than helps, a new perspective is offered on the issues raised by de-domestication. More 'thinking outside the box' with regard to animals and nature is recommended.
机译:去驯养是故意在野外建立一定数量的驯养动物或植物。随着时间的流逝,种群应该能够繁殖,自我维持并融入“野生”动物。通常,去驯养是较大的自然恢复计划的一部分,该计划旨在重新创造景观或重建以前的栖息地。去驯养是本文的重点,因为它既引起了人们对动物和自然的主要规范的关注,又引起了人们的质疑。这里的辩论涉及到将去驯养的动物视为野生动物还是非野生动物,这对应如何对待它们产生了影响。它还涉及自然的价值,以及认为适当的自然管理的种类和程度。本文首先描述了实际的非驯化做法,并考虑了在非驯化过程中人类对动物的职责特征。其次,本文探讨了非驯化对自然管理的影响,着眼于自然和野性的概念。最后,由于当前伦理学主题的划分(取决于动物和自然是否被驯化)阻碍了而不是帮助,因此对非本地化引发的问题提供了新的视角。建议更多有关动物和自然的“跳出思维”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Values》 |2010年第1期|57-78|共22页
  • 作者单位

    University of Copenhagen Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;

    rnWageningen University Centre for Methodical Ethics and Technology, Assessment (META);

    rnUniversity of Copenhagen Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;

    rnUniversity of Copenhagen Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    restoration; ethics; naturalness; welfare; wildness;

    机译:恢复;伦理;自然福利;荒野;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:56:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号