首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >Exploring the Use of Species Sensitivity Distributions to Define Protective Limits for the Use of Organic Wastes as Soil Amendments
【24h】

Exploring the Use of Species Sensitivity Distributions to Define Protective Limits for the Use of Organic Wastes as Soil Amendments

机译:探索利用物种敏感性分布来定义使用有机废物作为土壤改良剂的保护极限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of organic wastes as soil amendments can be an important measure to improve soil quality and reduce waste accumulation and landfilling. However, the potential contaminant loads of such wastes, can be a source of environmental concern. Consequently, legislation has been developed to regulate the use of these wastes in agricultural soils. However, the regulations only consider chemical parameters, which are insufficient to establish the level of environmental risk. A possible solution is the use of species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), employing ecotoxicological data from test batteries that could be incorporated into legislation. In the present study, 2 different hazardous concentrations affecting 5 and 50% of the soil community (HC5 and HC50, respectively) were determined using ecotoxicological data (effect concentrations, 10 and 50% [EC10 and EC50, respectively]) for 5 different wastes. The results demonstrate that, as expected, current legislative thresholds do not translate to environmental risk/protection and that SSDs may be an important tool allowing the simple inclusion and interpretation of ecotoxicological data from test batteries in legislation. On the other hand, SSDs must be used with caution because there are still doubts about their actual value in risk prediction and about which estimates provide adequate protection. For instance, the use of HC50(EC10) values is not recommended; these values overlap with the more conservative HC5(EC50) data, highlighting the fact that the use of lower effect concentrations may not always provide the most protective approach. Also, hazardous concentrations need to be calibrated at the field or semifield level, to verify environmental protection in different soils/environments and the adequacy of standard test organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1569-1576. (c) 2019 SETAC
机译:使用有机废物作为土壤改良剂可以是改善土壤质量和减少废物积累和填埋的重要措施。但是,此类废物的潜在污染物负荷可能会引起环境问题。因此,已制定法规来规范这些废物在农业土壤中的使用。但是,法规仅考虑化学参数,不足以确定环境风险水平。一种可能的解决方案是使用物种敏感度分布(SSD),利用来自测试电池的生态毒理学数据,这些数据可以纳入立法。在本研究中,使用生态毒理学数据(影响浓度分别为10%和50%[分别为EC10和EC50])确定了5种不同废物的2种不同危害浓度,分别影响土壤群落的5%和50%(分别为HC5和HC50)。 。结果表明,正如预期的那样,当前的立法阈值不会转化为环境风险/保护,并且SSD可能是一种重要工具,可以使立法中的测试电池的生态毒理学数据简单地包含和解释。另一方面,SSD必须谨慎使用,因为对于其在风险预测中的实际价值以及哪种估计可提供足够的保护仍然存有疑问。例如,不建议使用HC50(EC10)值。这些值与更保守的HC5(EC50)数据重叠,突出了以下事实:使用较低的效应浓度可能并不总是提供最具保护性的方法。同样,危险浓度需要在田间或半田间进行校准,以验证不同土壤/环境中的环境保护以及标准测试生物的适当性。 Environ Toxicol Chem 2019; 38:1569-1576。 (c)2019年SETAC

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号