首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >ELIMINATION HALF-LIFE AS A METRIC FOR THE BIOACCUMULATION POTENTIAL OF CHEMICALS IN AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL FOOD CHAINS
【24h】

ELIMINATION HALF-LIFE AS A METRIC FOR THE BIOACCUMULATION POTENTIAL OF CHEMICALS IN AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL FOOD CHAINS

机译:消除半衰期作为衡量水生和陆生食物链中化学物质生物累积潜力的指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The assessment of chemicals as bioaccumulative in the regulatory process makes use of the bioconcentration factor as a metric. However, this metric does not account for the dietary uptake route and therefore cannot be applied to terrestrial food chains. In recent years, the biomagnification factor (BMF) and the trophic magnification factor (TMF) have been suggested as standard metrics for bioaccumulation. For regulatory purposes, though, the BMF and the TMF also suffer from a number of shortcomings. They are not applicable to assess uptake routes other than the diet (e.g., dermal uptake, as is important for personal care products). When measured in the field, they depend largely on biological and ecological factors and less so on the chemical's properties, and they are difficult to normalize and standardize. In the present study, the authors suggest the elimination half-life (EL_(0.5)) of a chemical as an alternative metric for bioaccumulation. The EL_(0.5) is equivalent to the depuration rate constant (k_2) that is measured in various bioaccumulation and bioconcentration tests. This metric can be applied to air- and water-breathing animals, and it is valuable for all uptake routes. It has a number of practical advantages over the BMF and the TMF. In combination with a standard uptake scenario, the EL_(0.5) can also be linked directly to a BMF threshold of unity. Thus, the EL_(0.5) as a bioaccumulation metric overcomes the shortcomings of the BMF and the TMF while still conserving the advantages of the latter metrics.
机译:在监管过程中对化学物质是否具有生物蓄积性的评估利用了生物浓缩系数作为度量标准。但是,此度量标准并未考虑饮食摄入途径,因此无法应用于陆地食物链。近年来,生物放大因子(BMF)和营养放大因子(TMF)已被建议作为生物蓄积的标准指标。但是,出于监管目的,BMF和TMF也存在许多缺点。它们不适用于评估饮食以外的摄取途径(例如,皮肤摄取,这对个人护理产品很重要)。在现场进行测量时,它们很大程度上取决于生物学和生态因素,而对化学品性质的依赖性则较小,并且很难进行标准化和标准化。在本研究中,作者建议将化学物质的消除半衰期(EL_(0.5))作为生物积累的替代指标。 EL_(0.5)等于在各种生物累积和生物浓缩测试中测得的净化速率常数(k_2)。此度量标准可以应用于呼吸空气和呼吸水的动物,并且对于所有吸收路径都非常有用。与BMF和TMF相比,它具有许多实际优势。结合标准摄取方案,EL_(0.5)也可以直接链接到BMF统一阈值。因此,EL_(0.5)作为生物蓄积指标克服了BMF和TMF的缺点,同时仍保留了后者的优点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental toxicology and chemistry》 |2013年第7期|1663-1671|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany ,Tnstitute of Chemistry, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany;

    Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany;

    Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Bioaccumulation; Bioconcentration; Biomagnification; Regulatory rule;

    机译:生物蓄积;生物浓缩;生物放大;监管规则;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:30:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号