首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Life Cycle Assessment of a Palm Oil System with Simultaneous Production of Biodiesel and Cooking Oil in Cameroon
【24h】

Life Cycle Assessment of a Palm Oil System with Simultaneous Production of Biodiesel and Cooking Oil in Cameroon

机译:喀麦隆同时生产生物柴油和食用油的棕榈油系统的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of palm oil as a biofuel has been heavily debated for its land-use conflict with nature and its competition with food production, being the number one cooking oil worldwide. In that context we present a life cycle assessment of a palm oil production process yielding both biodiesel and cooking oil, incorporating the land-use impact and evaluating the effect of treating the palm oil mill effluent (POME) prior to disposal. The results show that the nonrenewable energy requirement global warming potential I6WP; exclusive land-use change), and acidification potential are lower than those of the fossil alternative. However, the system triggers an increase in eutrophication potential (EP) compared to the fossil fuel reference. This system shows less energy requirement global wanning and acidification reduction, and less eutrophi-cation increase compared to the reference than the same system converting all palm oil into biodiesel (no cooking oil production). The land occupation of palm oil triggers ecosystem quality (EQ) loss of 30-45% compared to the potential natural vegetation. Furthermore, such land-use change triggers a carbon debt neutralizing the GWP reduction for 45-53 years. The POME treatment scenarios reveal a trade-off between GWP and EP.
机译:棕榈油作为生物燃料的使用因其与自然的土地使用冲突以及与食品生产的竞争而备受争议,它是全球第一大食用油。在这种情况下,我们提出了一种棕榈油生产过程的生命周期评估,该过程既生产生物柴油又生产食用油,并结合了土地利用的影响并评估了在处置前对棕榈油厂废水(POME)进行处理的效果。结果表明,不可再生能源需求的全球变暖潜力为I6WP;专有的土地用途变更)和酸化潜力低于化石替代品。但是,与化石燃料参考相比,该系统触发了富营养化潜力(EP)的增加。与将所有棕榈油转化为生物柴油的相同系统(不生产食用油)相比,该系统显示出与参考相比更少的能源需求总体减少和酸化减少,富营养化增加更少。与潜在的自然植被相比,棕榈油的土地占用触发了30-45%的生态系统质量(EQ)损失。此外,这种土地用途的变化引发了碳债务,抵消了45-53年的全球升温潜能值降低。 POME处理方案显示了GWP和EP之间的权衡。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2010年第12期|P.4809-4815|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    rnDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    rnDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Grupo de Disciplinas da Ecologia da Hidrofera, Edificio Depanamental gab. 337, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal;

    rnDivision Agricultural and Food Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    rnDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号