首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >A Comparative Analysis of Odour Treatment Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Odour Treatment Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants

机译:污水处理厂除臭技术的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Biofiltration, activated sludge diffusion, biotrickling filtration, chemical scrubbing, activated carbon adsorption, regenerative incineration, and a hybrid technology (biotrickling filtration coupled with carbon adsorption) are comparatively evaluated in terms of environmental performance, process economics, and social impact by using the IChemE Sustainability Metrics in the context of odor treatment from wastewater treatment plants (VWVTP). This comparative analysis showed that physical/ chemical technologies presented higher environmental impacts than their biological counterparts In terms of energy, material and reagents consumption, and hazardous-waste production. Among biological techniques, the main impact was caused by the high water consumption to maintain biological activity (although the use of secondary effluent water can reduce both this environmental impact and operating costs), biofiltration additionally exhibiting high land and material requirements. From a process economics viewpoint technologies with the highest investments presented the lowest operating costs (biofiltration and biotrickling filtration), which suggested that the Net Present Value should be used as selection criterion. In addition, a significant effect of the economy of scale on the investment costs and odorant concentration on operating cost was observed. The social benefits derived from odor abatement were linked to nuisance reductions in the nearby population and improvements in occupational health within the WWTP, with the hybrid technology exhibiting the highest benefits. On the basis of their low environmental impact high deodorizaton performance, and low Net Present Value, biotrickling filtration and AS diffusion emerged as the most promising technologies for odor treatment in WWTP.
机译:通过使用必威投注网(IChemE)对生物过滤,活性污泥扩散,生物滴滤,化学洗涤,活性炭吸附,再生焚烧和混合技术(生物滴滤与碳吸附结合)进行了环境性能,工艺经济性和社会影响方面的比较评估废水处理厂(VWVTP)进行气味处理时的可持续性度量。这项比较分析表明,就能源,材料和试剂的消耗以及危险废物的产生而言,物理/化学技术比生物技术对环境的影响更大。在生物技术中,主要影响是由于维持生物活性所需的高水消耗(尽管使用次要废水可以减少这种环境影响和运营成本),生物过滤另外对土地和材料也有很高的要求。从过程经济学的角度来看,投资额最高的技术呈现出最低的运营成本(生物滤池和生物滴滤池),这建议将净现值用作选择标准。另外,观察到规模经济对投资成本和气味剂浓度对运营成本的显着影响。减少气味所带来的社会效益与减少附近居民的滋扰和改善污水处理厂内的职业健康有关,其中混合动力技术表现出最高的效益。由于其对环境的影响小,除臭性能高,净现值低,生物滴滤和AS扩散已成为污水处理厂中最有希望的气味处理技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2011年第3期|p.1100-1106|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, Valladolid University, Paseo del Prado de la Magdalena, sin, 47011, Valladolid, Spain;

    rnDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands,CH2M Hill, Level 7, 9 Help Street, Chatswood NSW 2067, Australia;

    rnDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, Valladolid University, Paseo del Prado de la Magdalena, sin, 47011, Valladolid, Spain;

    rnDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, Valladolid University, Paseo del Prado de la Magdalena, sin, 47011, Valladolid, Spain;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:03:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号